You can know, you just don’t know. This is because you are an idiot who apparently can’t keep things straight without having your own words repeated back to you.

You’re not answering the question. What inherent risk is someone in this situation at before someone decides to use violence against them?

What is laughable about people’s lives having the same value? What other metrics do you think modify the value of a life? Do you believe in Worthington’s Law?

You still don’t even know what I was responding to, so no, you didn’t tell me what the fuck you’re talking about.

What inherent risk is someone in this situation at before someone decides to use violence against them?

Perceived aggressors’ lives are worth the same as perceived victims’ lives, stupid.

You’re following it perfect, know what we’re talking about, yet have to ask what we’re talking about. Okay. Makes sense. You’ve got a firm grasp on reality.

Someone putting someone else at risk did not decide to put themselves at risk, they decided to put someone else at risk. They are only at risk because someone like you comes along and decides to shoot at them.

The problem is that you are lumping people together into a big mass. To you, death is about who deserves to die and therefore, since no one deserves to die (we both agree on that) it is never right to use violent and potentially lethal force. But it is precisely because I do not see it in those terms that I have a…

You’ve gone from being unable to follow the conversation enough to be able to remember which points you’re talking about to not even knowing what points are being talked about. Great.

You claim you’re not constantly bringing up religion. Then six sentences later, you bring up religion

Culture influences thought, it does not mean the reason I think the way I do is, as you keep bringing up, religion.

Then what the fuck are you talking about? Why are you talking?

You unintentionally presented a viable alternative to killing people and, even after having it pointed out to you, still can’t fathom not killing people. You are legitimately dangerous.

My ideas are my own, dumbshit. They’re not getting put there by dead people.

Yes, I do. Is that your entire point? What sort of accomplishment is pointing out that I realize something you seem to be in denial about?

You suggested that, to defend oneself without killing someone, one could “Aim at their arms and legs lol.”

That you genuinely believe people who were dead long before I was born have a well-formed opinion on where my morals come from is nearly literally insane.

That was my point. You just stated my point lol. You think most people are shitty.

You already offered up an answer to your own question. I pointed that out to you already, you dumb as shit motehrfucker.