These laws are bad laws and should be changed. Putting people in jail for letting customers play Wii U and maybe lending out a copy of Super Mario Bros is stupid. For shame, Japan.

If PlayStation wants to stay on their own little multiplayer island, fine, whatever. I primarily play Fortnite on PC, and “portable” would be my preferred secondary console experience, so I’d happily forfeit my ability to play on PS4 in order to play on Switch instead. The fact that you simply don’t have the option to…

I believe it is. The brutality and intensity is completely necessary for the kind of game they’re making. If you’re horrified and bothered by the violence it means they’re doing their jobs right.

I’m actually the complete opposite - I find that in first person you get a much better immersion and can actually notice all the small details in the environment - Like looking at a graffiti from up close, or even just looking at the rabble on the road - everything can feel so much more personal and immersive.

Very glad they are taking this First Person. I was never a fan of Witcher’s combat mechanics or overall “feel”. To me, while Witcher 1, 2, 3 improved over each installment, never did the movement mechanics and combat reach the same level as their dialogue, voice acting, graphics, and overall other gameplay (excluding…

You can customize your character appearance and everything else related about how he/she looks.

That info dump was bonkers.

It’s exactly what I wanted out of a new Smash game. Putting every character from the series as well as making every stage have a tournament setup is amazing.

This looks like everything I wanted and more. I really appreciate the quality of life changes; this makes Shulk a hell of a lot more interesting.

i might have put bethesda just above microsoft there, but by a narrow margin. it feels like they are the only two companies taking e3 seriously so far.

This is still the one game so far to catch my interest at Ubi. The piracy stuff was the best part of Black Flag and I’m surprised it took so long to take advantage of what they built with it but glad they’re doing so now.

Is it? I don’t think it’s hard to acknowledge that game development is extremely hard while also criticizing shitty marketing and hype.

FF7 Remake was announced at E3 2015. I think it’s fair to expect that three years later we might hear at least a tiny bit about it. And it’s embarrassing that Square Enix is pulling a Versus XIII again.

YOU SHUT YOUR FUCKING WHORE MOUTH

In all seriousness, after the wild and continuing success of Skyrim, I can’t imagine they’d make this shit multiplayer. They already have a multiplayer ES game — they’re not gonna do that to their main franchise. At worst, maybe it’s optional co-op or something, but I can’t even see…

You mean people didn’t come for Fallout? Cause I’m pretty sure most people came for Fallout.

I love how the only things people wanted from this conference was Doom 2, Starfield, and Elder Scrolls VI and all we essentially got were title screens for two of them and barely a teaser for the third.

Consumers need options, not monopolies.

That doesn’t really make sense. A genre is super popular, so therefore it should only be concentrated into one game?

Makes sense,

Fuck it, as someone who loves BR, I’m honestly just relieved to see a battle royale game by a company that has a reputation for at least trying to improve the reliability of their games over a reasonable span of time and actually somewhat vaguely knows how to make a military-themed shooter that mostly doesn’t run…