Fuckin’ “justice for Han”. Way to turn a justly fan-favourite character into a recurring annoyance.
Fuckin’ “justice for Han”. Way to turn a justly fan-favourite character into a recurring annoyance.
Nobody ever brags about having seen a shorter cut.
From what I recall he really wanted the first Avengers movie to be everybody vs. Hulk. Not much of a team player!
I liked TIH more than most people; it had a better looking and scarier Hulk, the best city-smashing superhero action you could get at the time, and a couple of villains who were worth a shit which was something early MCU movies didn’t have so many of.
If it’s a romcom, I want to see air and earth fuck.
Didn’t he lick her face in that? That’d be my last movie too.
Trailer got a great crowd reaction when I saw it, but I don’t remember what movie it was in front of.
I missed The Hateful Eight in theatres entirely because I kept reading that I just have to see it in the right format, which turned out to be no format that was available here.
I screwed up my ticket for Guardians 3 and had to buy at the counter, for the first time in years.
At least comic-book multiverse bullshit is straightforward and honest about what it is. The Han shit in that franchise was preposterous: three movies of bending time and space to give a dead character more screen time, and then figuring, let’s just say he never died, because family never dies I guess. Unless they do?
While I kinda agree in principle - infinite universes just leads to infinite bullshit - these things are making a ton of money and aren’t slowing down. This is like writing a “superhero fatigue” article in 2013.
For one of those $200M projects, this has got to be the first thing I’d read as online chatter about this show. Otherwise it’s just my dad, who emailed me unprompted to tell me it sucks.
What exactly was this disruption?
Ass-numbing.
I think they stuck with the ending this time, though I don’t remember how explicit the book got about it.
I totally see her point broadly speaking, and maybe there being four Olivias (and for that matter three Ninas, I don’t think we ever met original redverse Nina) might’ve watered the women down, so to speak. But there was never a point where Fringe didn’t have a heavy lean on the father-son stuff.
I’d be interested to see what she said; the math on this show for who it’s focused on is pretty wacky compared to most shows because there’s only one Peter, but there’s two, arguably four of everybody else. I never felt by the end that it wasn’t focused enough on Olivia, but she didn’t make interestingly dubious “oh…
Markle’s role was I think as a potential replacement for Torv who was apparently threatening to leave? That’s a lot of “I think” and “apparently”’s though.
Yeah, that’s the impression I’m getting. Finding it out so specifically about two Abrams shows at the same time was just...at first I thought “fucking hell, Abrams” and then “ugh, it’s all like this, isn’t it?”
Die screaming, fucko