I may be in the minority here, but I think this is a genuinely good looking vehicle.

Ignition switches. What went wrong?

And somehow that's the least-gaudy vehicle they've yet produced.

Mike, you've flat-out nailed it. This is the very essence of enthusiasm: not numbers, not all out ability, but the way it moves you.

Bitches about bigotry.

*that's not how math works, George Carlin*

FUEL CELLS ARE DEAD, MAN! MY BARCALOUNGER ENGINEERING DEGREE ENTITLES ME TO SAY THAT.

It's going to sell like hotcakes, much like the prior versions.

I'm just missing the tongue-in-cheek flavor here, right?

Blessings from the fair $kay! Thank you, ma'am.

Perhaps I'm off base here, but I think these kinds of rally spectators are just massively selfish. No driver should ever be burdened with the weight the lives of spectators, particularly when casualties are a result of completely avoidable, non-freak accident type incidents.

Methinks you're mixing up the terms "legality" and "morality".

I think you'll going to get a lot of pushback from people with Ford at the top, especially with Ferrari at 3 (hooray people getting upset about meaningless things on the internet!), but I think your tagline to the Ford entry kind of nails it: ubiquity. They're simply everywhere, and have been successful in most of…

But now also consider that a regular four-year service on a Porsche Carrera GT costs $8,000.

Don't necessarily disagree, but as far as idling-and-blip goes, this one ranks highly.

2. The methodology isn't great:

As someone who has complained a lot about the ubiquity and abuses of the Martini livery recently: well-done.

In before armchair experts decry the continued research into fuel-cell technology despite the fact that major manufacturers continue to look into it and expand their programs.

CULTURAL APPROPRIATION TRIGGER WARNING

It doesn't sound awful, but it still sounds disappointing compared to the latest N/A Mercedes V8s.