The Owls Are Not What They Seem.

Yes, I see all the same arguments for Momoa not being a problem for Aquaman, while looking nothing like the iconic character, were the same ones used for it being no big deal that he was cast as, Conan.

And really, the fact that old foofy runs you down and has to hide and stalk my old comments to mention things about me in totally unrelated posts should tell you one thing...

Hahaha, every mention I get equates success. So scared now you can't even allow them to mention me.

Yeah, just so you know. Guess you got told djandi! Hahahaha. You're own douchebag "friends" call you out, right foofy?

I thought the only side effect of D&D was that it made you more susceptible to lunch money extortion.

Well, you know it is. Those guys are picked because they can do repairs outside an orbiting space station that is going thousands of miles an hour around a planet. They're not going to snap out of that because one of their crew is in trouble outside, that is a constant threat.

That was my take. "How do I get him in this scenario...."

That would make sense, but i mean plothole in the sense as listed in the above criteria: a character acts in inexplicable ways. The Dave of the movie is cool as a cucumber, as soon as he sees the situation, he cooly disposes of Frank, much like refuse, then cooly faces the vacuum of space, then rather detachedly shuts…

He was cool and collected the whole time. Dave never got panicked, even in this scene. That was the whole dynamic, that Hal was more emotional than his human counter-parts. Had Dave literally leaped up from his bed in his civvies, it would have made more sense, but a military officer is trained to do things by rote,…

Why the hell would Dave leave without his helmet? Hal had already exhibited enough strange behavior to worry the astronauts enough to consider shutting him down, but he then leaves himself to such a vulnerable position?

Several replies later, called that too. You want a brush with something bigger than yourself, I give it to you. In a charitable mood and since I'm mobile now, I waste no time. You, on the other hand.

There's that reply, just like I said. I was banned by read, I told people that and have his email telling me, since you care.

Chearing? And, um, here I am? So...

Not sure why you'd care, since I have no idea who you are, but they didn't. Now as Shitty and unclicked as Taylor's writing is, I can see why he would claim it. He sure won't be remembered for anything he wrote.

Yeah, my beef with many of these is usually structure/quality of writing. Since so many essays have a minority at the heart, that criticism somehow turns into me hating them for being black/woman/gay. Hell, i was the only one that defended the Beth Dearaujo essay-I really liked it!- but I didn't call her detractors…

I meant more the commenters than the staff. People are so convinced that I am whatever they would like me to be: racist, failed writer, troll etc that I have simply become that. No matter what I write at this point, it just becomes more proof of whatever they had in mind. Outside of Sizor Sister, we had the best…

Nice, I'll warn you that if you are seen as sticking up for me in any way, shape or form, you will be harassed. I've said all kinds of mean shit to most of the Gawker/Clashtalk set, in my defense all I can say is they routinely show up to start shit with me, which I oblige. They generally get really mad because I…

Oh, and I was banned again. So look for another bon something next week.