Bring out the torches....

How can someone not like CI, that's the best one!

They had the Nussbaum character actually get aroused by the violence——-pretty damned egregious because in the real case she was beaten nearly to death.

How do you handle the alcohol poisoning?

A few years ago, one of my favorite bars closed and then re-opened with new owners a few months later. They kept everything exactly the same except they pulled out the carpet and re-did the women's bathroom (I don't know if they re-did the men's too). I was SO excited!

No, this article is not the alternative to keeping shit in the family. Dylan coming out to the NYT is the alternative to "keeping family shit in the family." That act empowered her and allowed her to talk about what happened to her on her own terms without a Woody Allen filter. Ronan, Mia and Moses have all chosen to…

I think it's a better message than "keep family shit in the family," which would be the alternative, and give Allen free reign to do horrible things if everything Dylan and Mia say is true. If something like that happened in my family I'd want people outside the situation to be all over it.

But again, why are we talking about the family dynamic at all? How is Daisy Previn's job as an office manager of a construction company a) anyone's business and b) remotely relevant to whether Allen molested Dylan? Does Lark's tragic story tell us anything about that day in the attic? How is publishing Dylan's real…

Heard about the Aberdeen Proving Ground scandal? One guy was charged with eighteen rapes. He was convicted and got about three days in jail for each one.

Oh, it's definitely not fair to them. None of this is. Even if none of the people involved were in the public eye, no part of this would have been fair to the children. If we're going to talk about their family dynamic, though, it is definitely relevant.

Only two of these children has gone on to seek fame and/or a public life. The rest seem to be private, ordinary people who have the misfortune of having their mother's ex-boyfriend molest one sister and marry another. Bringing them more into the spotlight than they already are doesn't seem particularly fair.

C'mon, this is super different from the Daily Beast and others attacking Mia. It's a fairly dispassionate review of the context in which all this is taking place. I think that you'd be hard pressed to find a more relevant article on the subject.

And wow. I just realized something kind of profound. What if my sister really was 3 at the time, and some of her documented learning disabilities could be attributed to a poor estimate of her age, since she was always compared to those who were age 5?

Plus, almost 21 at the time the affair came to light. I think it's inappropriate to round up to 21 when we don't know when the affair started, only that it started at some point before the time it was discovered.

That seems pretty unlikely - she is not really noteworthy enough for anyone to even bother blackmailing her into making a porn video, or risk being sued over releasing something without her consent. I'm going with the other prevailing theory, which is that for marketing reasons Vivid wanted to release this as a "sex…

The judges in the custody case and appeal had nothing good to say about Woody:

This just confirms for me that Mia Farrow is/was motivated by her MATERNAL feelings for her children, and NOT sexual jealousy over Woody Allen.

Fairly sure you don't know what you're talking about, since Mia found out about the affair when Soon Yi was 19. Fairly sure you're being disgustingly disingenuous when you characterize Woody Allen and Soon Yi as "an older person dates a younger." Fairly sure you're gross.

It goes well with my new designer necklace.

My approach is wait and see. If he actually does take down his OKC profile soon. I'll be more willing to believe him. So, I created a dummy profile just to keep everyone honest. If I see that he's still active and hasn't taken down his profile mine's going back up and we're going to have a little chat about honesty.