Oh geez I didn’t know Brian Gleeson was in Logan Lucky. That makes my Star Wars-fueled desire to see it even worse.

I think the thing is, Lynch is good at making people uncomfortable in very intense, directed moments and then diffusing it when he doesn’t need that mood anymore. He isn’t making people self-flagellate for twelve hours, without any real payoff or just to be up his own ass - he’s got something to show you and knows he…

Aghhh it does though! I keep forgetting how badly I want to see it but have to make emotional time and space for it.

Haha!

And they’re Ed Harris’s sons, which makes me so much more interested. But oh my god do I not want to see this. I used to love this auteur shit in highschool - thought I was so smart for enjoying Gus Van Sant and even Lars Von Trier - but these days David Lynch is the only person I want to make me uncomfortable.

Ugh, that’s the truth.

My Seattle condo complex has lavender growing on the rooftop and I steal it for cocktails sometimes. I think they keep trying to replace it with other food plants, though.

Part of the reason I moved to Seattle was because no one gave a shit about sports out here

My judgebeast.

ohgod

I mean, I’m a nonbinary individual that doesn’t have a penis, but I, uh, can see the appeal. There would be something really gratifying about seeing visual proof of pleasure in an external, tangible way. I can also see how it could be useful to add extra lube in the moment, without pausing. Hypothetically, it would be…

Do you have any tips on those fronts?

I do medical billing and a lot of what I need can’t be communicated via email, since our email servers aren’t as ironclad as phone calls and faxed document. Like a sensible millenial, I loathe fax machines and unless what I need is a sizable document or an exact image of some data, I have learned to bite phone call…

I actually loved this piece as a reasonable discussion and not just the PRO and ANTI positions I keep seeing on tumblr! Ideological purity is just an excuse to send hatemail to other people in the name of some abstract standard, and I’m so sick of it. It feels like it hits content that’s trying (say, Dream Daddy) much…

So I’m a nonbinary bi person dating another person who could be described the same way, and I am super curious about this game but I was really baffled by one thing - if your character can have dated a woman in the past and had a child with one, is there an explicitly textual reason that it’s all male-identifying…

I have to say that I really want a Pikmin app game, maybe a silly phone game. I love the aesthetic and the cuteness of the little buds, but I get so stressed out by the idea of letting any of them get hurt that the games are fundamentally unfun for me. A charming puzzle platformer sounds like a good time, but this one…

Yeah, I mean, the spectrum between “sewing up a woman post-childbirth for her husband’s enjoyment” and “sewing a woman’s labia together so you know she’s pure” isn’t as wide as I want it to be.

Also, sometimes the dog will let you know. Mine has developed this very funny behavior where she can sense if someone’s really jazzed about her, and she’ll flop on her back and roll around begging for skritches. She had a rough life before my partner rescued her, but she’s just thrilled about attention from particular…

I also do a lot of roleplay via email and having the game window and the chat about the game open in the same tab is kind of perfect. I like being able to have records of everything in one place.

The thief is the real hero here. No one should ever do this ever again and preventing it is a noble goal.