Yeah, that too. I was assuming good-faith estimations wrt transportation, which is pure Dunning–Kruger on his part. If he’s looking specifically at one part of tunnel construction costs being cheaper, for example, even then it’s only because the tunnel is, as you say, too small, too unsafe, too limited in scope.

But...but .... Elon Musk is a.....supergenius!

Bow down before him, and worship him at the church of your choice!

So, I’ll admit my ignorance here - as well as my inability to reliably detect sarcasm on Musk-threads.

May I ask - is this true? Does pavement in underground tunnels wear at a slower rate than above ground? Is this true (except with regard to overweight vehicles) for multilane ones open to public vehicles as well?

You? I like

How dare you! The idea was always for a DriveyTube.

Sure, but the slow movement of the earth along fault lines also tends to crack concrete and asphalt.

Correct. There’s definitely no frequently occuring natural phenomenon in California that would impact the pavement.

OH, yeah, Musk sounds like a sweetheart...

Remind me again, how many decades does Tesla get to call itself a start-up?

Lol cheap and fast and too small to be functional for mass transit. I can dig a hole in the yard in 10 minutes, so what?

The way you guys worship this bullshit artist is sad and fascinating

Wow. You guys are something— an online threat to me and my family? That’s a felony these days.

Lol

This was never meant as mass transit, it is a plan for billions of dollars of public money expropriated for the transit of millionaires.

Yup, LA is well known for having stable ground. It’s not like there are dozens of active fault lines there. . . .

How is that lashing out? Damn you Elon fanboys are such babies.

Approx. 3 minutes saved. For how much?

The last time someone told me “It just works” we got Fallout 76

This just in, new “ElonSpeak” definitions: