Welp, I have a friend with photodermititis so that doesnt say much :)

. . no it doesnt. That’s not a lightbulb. Unless we are looking at different graphics?

Look. You can disagree. But it is hardly a kooky fringe belief. The rest of the world is seriously considering it, which should give you pause. It’s not conclusive, just pause.

Obviously the same way they do it in Europe. Just like GMOs in Europe. But you guys all think that’s dumb too. Gosh, those Eurpoeans. So behind the times. (Well, France is fucking up).

Thanks. I hit my monthly limit but will log in when I get home and read.

No one said you werent latinx. I said if you are and believe Hillary has “ties” to the hispanic community youd be hard pressed to prove that.

Right. So we agree. But you petty. Cool.

Of course that’s right. And we’ve also had an increase in a number of diseases that we never saw before. Now, there may be a correlation and there may not be. I’m really not trying to draw any conclusions. But there are a million and one variables out there, and to pretend this isn’t one is absurd. Is it the most…

Believe what sorts of things? Please tell me what you think I’m claiming to believe? Because I’m actually claiming non-belief. That is: just because science has not established a link between a physical harm and some external source does not mean none exists. If people want to investigate to ensure consumer saftey…

I completely agree. Your own link puts the risk into context, which is important, and makes it clear that no link has been proven, which is important to note, while also offering precautionary technqiues for people who want to hedge their bets:

Ciao.

That actually isn’t the inference at all. I was trying to point out that his reaction was a common technique used by republicans to evade the substance of an argument. I know he is not a republican. I liked several of his progressive comments earlier today. But that doesn’t mean he isn’t wrong here.

Cool.

News flash. I’m spelling lots of stuff wrong. No spell check, and this is the internet. But thanks for volunteering to be my personal secretary.

Well, there is ample evidence to back me up. But you have declared it’s not so on the internet, so that must be the case.

I’ve explained how this is logical fallacy elsewhere.

Lol. Who is trying to change your vote? If that’s why you engage in conversations on the interent I have something dissapointing to tell you.

I literally don’t know what you’re talking about so I’m obviously not basing my opinion on it.

I hope your doctor doesn’t have that attitude.

Yep. It’s pretty stupid to think you can know for a fact that with your tiny human brain there is no being in the universe that could be considered “god like.”