bivyg
BIVYg
bivyg

obviously I’m not going to convince you that trump will be worse for everyone than Clinton.

Welp, the Liz Warren thing happened. And she was wrong for it. (Though it certainly doesn’t cancel out all the good work she’s done). You, by contrast, are fully making something up. Like this:

I am agressively saying yes. YES YES PICK ME! IT’S MY LIFE DREAM! MY CALLING!

Dear The View,

1) We don’t “agree.” But I am mature enough to understand opposing views. I wish we had that in common.

. . .ok. So, you completely made up something and you’re standing by it. Points for tenacity I guess? Lol.

Welp, that’s the difference between you and me. To you, someone who rejects hillary is like a priviliged art student. But the people I know are the members of my midwestern African American family who are earing minimum wage, aging fast, just getting out of jail on long sentences driven up by the Clinton’s crime bill,

I am saying that I think that the consequences of a Clinton presidency will not be as bad as the consequences of Trump one, and I urge others to consider that.

You’re right. Your comment was base, purile, unconstructive, and innacurate. But not ad homenim.

long term, devastating consequences of a Trump presidency.

I believe Clinton is corrupt because her policies are influenced by her willingness to take money from questionable sources. I think Sanders lost an election and had to endorse her. He did not “toss aside his morals.” or “endorse her enthusastically.” If you listened to his speech, he said she was more qualified than

What does corrupt mean to you? You think Sanders is corrupt? Which is it? Are their platforms so similar that Sanders suppoters are babies to still protest? Or is endorsing her corrupt?

I think that’s a good summary (though I don’t question your motives. I think your motives are pure, and that the only way you (or any good person) can be willing to kick the can of progress down the road in light of contemporary suffering is to be unaware of how bad and pervasive that suffering is).

You must be a dumb dumb minority who had to pad your resume extra thick! Cuz that’s how it works!

The only time I’ve used the phrase “I dont like her” is in response to people who have said “you don’t like her.” You want to make it about a cult of personality because that’s what it is for you. I care about the fact that this is a woman so bought out by various interests that she finds the statement “I believe in

1) Someone dressed in a funny outfit is a fair target. A sexist is a fair target. Pretending like the hundreds of protestors advocating for palestenian rights and other progressive issues are fair targets, and asking random people on the street who have evinced no sexim if “maybe they’re secretly sexist”* and thereby

Sorry, I’m really not following you, but I scrolled past this and can’t help but note the irony of you advocating for long term change, noting that an election is a short term fix, and at the same time pillorying me for wanting long term change by possibly throwing an election in the short term.

I disagree with your accusation, that a vote for HRC is a necessarily and inevitably a vote to enable and strengthen systemic racism

You know what I meant: No american racial caste wtih blacks (or any one race) at the bottom.

No offense, but you just jumped in a conversation and said the same thing 20 others have said. It’s particularly frustrating because those other 20 people also grossly misunderstood the argument, and I spent alot of time patiently explaining it to them. You’re going to ahve to do the work on your own without my help,