better-red-than-dead
better red than dead
better-red-than-dead

Never heard of jim webb

Booker would be the lobbyist stooge there, McRaven is the natsec ghoul. Obama-Trump voters are a red herring, low turnout and an uninspired base swung the election. It’s almost like running people who don’t offer a positive vision of the future and a path to making material improvements in peoples’ daily lives doesn’t

LOL natsec ghoul/lobbyist stooge 2020 is a good way to repeat 2000, if you’re lucky.

Carries a lot of weight... doing what?

I have a Colorado, my previous truck was a 2008 quad cab Ram 1500 - they’re almost the same length but the difference in width completely changes how they drive (and park) in the city.

All football coaches at the college level and up are fascist goons. Probably all of them at the high school level and up... and frankly, all the way down to Pee Wee it’s mostly the dads who wish they could be cops to keep ‘those people’ in line.

My dad was from San Francisco and I dreamed of having the money to move there one day and when I took trips there in the early-mid ‘00s I still held on to that dream. City Lights and AT&T Park and wandering through the Mission and etc..

Then I visited it post-Web 2.0 boom when hotel room rates had tripled and basically

Sure you did.

... people wouldn’t pay the actual cost of an Uber ride. If they would, rideshare companies would charge it. Uber’s value proposition requires that they be cheap enough that driving yourself isn’t worth it (in most of the country) and in areas well-served by taxis that they be cheaper than those.

The only way to

Force Uber to pay a living base wage, classify their drivers as employees, and limit the number of cars deployed.

It is such an incredibly dark view of humanity to believe that the only reason people do anything is that they face the alternative of dying in a ditch.

Ugh, looks too much like their godforsaken sedan.

Is that really what this is? DSA members in NY are going to vote for Nixon, guaranteed - the fundamental question is whether they should, as an organization, endorse non-members. This isn’t a single interest group (say, reproductive rights) that can endorse the candidate with the strongest record/policy line

A home for aging knuckleballers.

As opposed to his gold digging, worthless relatives who were eagerly awaiting his death?

At least his wife had to put in some work and touch his sad, saggy old man balls.

Steal whatever you can from the big/evil boys?

Three guys my dad worked with (one in flooring, two plumbers) actually did move from independent contracting to working for Home Depot in the late ‘90s or early ‘00s as in-store experts. The pay was very close to what an individual plumber (not running multiple crews) could pull down without the miseries of being an

Home Depot certainly deserves it, but it also presents a fallacy that other big boxers are a Utopia.

I’d be more worried about a Cascadia ‘big one’

You’re still arguing the merits of the case, you weird nerd.