bennytherotty
Benny
bennytherotty

Momoa is a good Hawaii boy — he knows the correct direction the shaka is supposed to face!

If a gun-toting homeowner can kill someone to prevent the theft of a tv, why can’t nations kill poachers? Poachers are committing a crime against the planet.

perhaps our kids’ kids will see better odds 

I’m pretty sure the 1973 animated Robin is how Furries became a thing.

The creepiest part was the girl stuck into a painting.  But maybe nowdays, the scariest part to a child would be spending a holiday in a stuffy hotel filled with old people.

Now playing

It was mildly funny in “If Google Was a Guy,” but that was over 4 years ago.

Any article on tigers depresses the hell out of me, because they will go extinct in my lifetime. Then I go someplace like Starbucks and see a picture of a tiger on their bag of Sumatran coffee, and I think how nice it is for the corporation to put up a memorial to the animal they are driving extinct. Or how palm oil

I had no idea what these people do, and even when I see it in movies or on tv, it still seems so foreign.  So thank you for this article.

I would be ok with that. After the pile of garbage that was GotG Vol. 2, Marvel needs a fresh start to that franchise — bring in Waititi and Valkyrie (who is better than Starlord and Gamora combined), Korg, etc., and keep only Rocket and Groot from the Guardians gang = 1,000% instant improvement.

Her closeted bigotry is clear from the very first movie (and I’m guessing book too, since people have said the movie follows the book almost exactly). Non-white people are almost non-existent. But more than that, even her “good guys” make bigoted comments like complaining about “muggles” (and using the word in a

Maybe it’s just me, but everything I hear about “Ralph Breaks the Internet” doesn’t sound like it started as a story the filmmakers wanted to tell — rather, more like a cash grab.

Hollywood has a long history of sexual abuse of minors. If this was an industry that really had its act together, hiring a sex offender might not be a big deal. But Hollywood, right now (and some other institutions too, like the Catholic Church), is NOT a place to open its doors and welcome sex offenders. You argument

They should have fired Gunn after the crapfest that was GotG 2. Since they needed a fresh start anyway, I don’t have any problems with them replacing Gunn because of some old comments he made. I also wouldn’t mind replacing Bautista. Actually, they should scrap all GotG characters except Rocket and Groot. Just have

I thought it was a stupid category as well. I do understand that movies without mass appeal could benefit financially from the publicity surrounding an Oscar nomination more than, say, a Star Wars movie. But if that’s the case, why not work backwards — instead of creating a “best popular movie” category, why not keep

He claimed that no one would notice that Don Cheadle replaced Terrance Howard in Iron Man because he “couldn’t tell the difference.

Not after the movie bombs.  And it will - and Fox knows it, which is why they moved its release to the dumping grounds.

I think you make a good point that others are ignoring, that the movie industry is in serious need of cleaning up their atmosphere of sexual harassment, sex assault, etc. That is not the type of employer who, at this point in time, should be opening its doors as a charity to help rehabilitate sex offenders. If

I think people forget that movies, more than pretty much any other business, live or die by publicity. There has been a very long history in Hollywood of studios holding their talent to certain standards of conduct in their personal lives, because they cannot afford to risk bad publicity. When cases of “exceptions”

Except that we’ve all heard how movies hold their talent to certain standards of conduct off-screen, because movies live or die on publicity and they can’t risk bad publicity. If Ms. Munn was a convicted sex offender who tried to solicit a child and didn’t tell the studio, I’m sure the studio would have grounds to

I agree with your post, despite other posters saying “they’re just actors.” “Just actors” went to bat in defense of GotG Director Gunn, and the vast, vast majority of posters here supported those actors’ activism. But now, the majority is saying actors shouldn’t get involved?  Methinks their biases are showing.