belg
Out, but with a W - has found the answer
belg

You’re right, the combination of lightest weight, lowest price and rev-happiest engine with the highest redline (7500rpm) will never persuade anyone here. Has anyone tried Hellcat-swapping the ND yet?

Looks like he’s in way over his head.

This should be the time where I point out that you guys don’t get the best version of the MX-5 (the 1.5), but then I saw the Abarth’s US price. NP and a no-brainer every time. Over here (Euroland) the Abarth is over 40% more expensive than the top of te line 2.0 MX-5 (40k vs 28k).

“Pew! Pew! Pewpewpew!” - Everyone

Why? Because Audi knows it will sell.

Now playing

Sure, but you can’t really go off the beaten path with the Ro...

Rolls Royce Phantom, since there really is no SUV/crossover/wagon alternative available.

There’s always this, if you really have to have the most carbon fiber.

Ah, this ship has sailed then. Land Ahoj!

Looks like we’re almost running out of puns, although I’m guessing you have another Combi left.

Though not as Popular as your original comment, this is my Favorit for mentioning an historical model.

Yeti left enough Roomster for that one.

Fabialous, even.

Better yet: a Fauxrari show, with a collection of the most botched MR2s, Fieros, etc. I’d pay at least $3.08 for that, as long as it comes with a glass of the finest boxed red.

Truth be told, cpus are not a good example in this case, since they follow Moore’s Law, which states that the number of transistors (~processing power) on an IC (chip/cpu) doubles every two years (originally every one year). This transfers to price as well: for a cpu that is as powerful as one two years ago, you can