Why do we comment on celebrities' looks at all? "She's gorgeous!" "She's hideous!" Equally meaningless, since no one cares about anyone else's opinions!

People can't understand that I love to look at women, but it stops there. No touchy!

Man Bros love to get naked together. I'm sorry but this all sounds like straight up group sexual assault.

We'll have to agree to disagree, but as a fellow tattooed person I'll say that my tattoos are as much a part of my body as my stretch marks or scars, and I find it in bad taste for strangers to impose their conceptions of beauty on them.

I actually love it, but I think with the line of her top through it, the detail is obscured and it looks off.

I really, really doubts she cares that you don't approve.

You construct your own sentences, correct? Then yeah, I will hold you responsible for the words that you say. If you check the other comments on this article you will see that it's really not that complicated of a word to understand.

Laws aren't meant to "fight against" "violent rapists" they're meant to punish rapists. Rape doesn't have to be "violent" to be rape. Rapists don't have to be "violent" to be rapists. Coercing someone into having sex with you is rape, and having sex with someone who is unable to consent to sex for any reason is rape.…

Both, and what they did is discussed in the original article (which I link in the first paragraph).

People still cannot take photographs from, for example, a public vantage point, into a private area (i.e., a bedroom) because of the expectation of privacy people have in private areas of their homes. I would argue that a crotch is a private area.

This is absolutely disgusting, and the fact that this man, or anyone, thinks they have the right to photograph up a womans skirt/shorts/etc. is just abhorrent. You have absolutely no right to see what is "up my skirt" just because I am wearing a skirt. You have the right to see what is "up my skirt" if I pull up my…

If you have to go out of your way to take a picture of a ladies undergarments then yes I think you have an expectation of privacy. These ladies aren't going around buck naked and getting angry because people took pictures of them. Someone targeted them for harassment and violated their personal space. That's illegal.

Uh. No. That is not how it works. Just because you exist in public does not mean people get to take photos of areas that would normally be covered by your clothing. Wearing a skirt is not the same as walking down the street in a bikini. A woman in a skirt has the reasonable expectation that no one is going to see her…

Can I argue that introducing my fist to your face counts as free speech too, Masshole?

Plus, I'm not sure why in a make-believe world people have a problem with discontinuity in race? It's not even real bro!

I'm waiting for all the comic book nerds to say that they hate this because Peter Parker is meant to be white not ethnic and canon is important and why are we trying to shove this shit down everyone's throat but I'm not racist I just think it's important to stick to canon.

I feel like a non-violent, reasonable person who can see the best in anyone most of the time. But what I have to say now is this: Murder them slowly and then mount their heads on my wall so that I may have something to punch whenever I read about shits like this. Jesus.

Whew. Okay. Back to normal.

It's like, I don't WANT to advocate physical violence, but I also want nothing more than to set each one of these repugnant shitstain's testicles on fire.

"I do terrible, reprehensible, criminal things all the time that ruin people's lives...but I'm a good person!"

The girls are too humiliated by their exposure to come forward. And police say they can't do a damn thing about it. In fact, police knew about the group's active and disgusting Facebook page but say they weren't able to have the thing taken down.