Wait... You don’t have the Tomorrowland Tranit Authority (People Mover) in California? Yup, Disney World still reigns supreme. * smug Floridian smile*
BakaPenguin
bakapenguin
Keep fighting the good fight, man. Maybe someday these people will realize that CE’s and pre-orders do not equal better games or experiences.
No way. That’s when Elder Scrolls VI: Elsweyr is slated to release. :-)
If you want an honest, albeit cynical, answer... Money. Somewhere, somehow I know Money is involved.
I wear glasses, I know what you mean. The article claims that those with glasses can wear them, not whether it’ll be very comfortable. As you say, we’ll have to wait to find out. I’m hoping they’ve solved that problem. If not, perhaps software could go along to make wearing prescription lenses unnecessary while…
The public would have an advocate at FISA court hearings
Seriously. Why is this not playable in a browser, so I can play on my Chromebook? It’s 2015, dammit ><
If you give people the tools to build what ever they want, they are going to make penises. It’s, unfortunately, inevitable.
You have no control over tax obligations, you can completely control supporting a sports organization.
And, yet, people still support this organization by going to events, purchasing video games, and other merchandise. I have a question, if people supposedly knew about the corruption for so long, why have they supported the organization? Oh yeah, because they only care when someone puts a spotlight on it. Oh, and of…
So, have you played the original GTA? Rampage Mode was a mission where you got a single weapon and the goal was to rack up as much carnage as possible. If people didn’t need to express their idiotic butthurt over a stupid game, it would never have garnered any attention and likely would have been completely unheard…
Admittedly, I’m basing my judgment on the assumption that this is based on a book. If it is, that story does not belong to Rockstar, but rather the author of the book.
Sure, the BBC gets about ~$8 billion USD in revenue, but Take-two interactive isn’t exactly an underdog at ~$2.3 billion. I don’t think either is being a bully, here. But, Take-Two is certainly trying to make a buck they don’t necessarily have a right to.
It’s not really suit worthy at all, I don’t think. It’s based on a book:
Cats are natural hunters and have been kept, historically, for reducing vermin populations around farmsteads. Dogs, unless they are trained for hunting(and even then they are meant to track, not kill, prey), typically were for corralling livestock and even the protection of property.
Every single one of those attractions are common fairground rides with a Pokemon facade. Clearly, they had no intention of making a permanent themepark.
I was thinking the same thing, myself. However, to be fair, GawkerMedia controls the ads, I doubt the writers have any control over them. Most likely they all use ABP, or the like, as most everyone else.
At the end of the day, standards compliance is the most important thing with a web browser, especially these days. So, I’ll be impressed, and consider switching from Chrome, when Microsoft can at least break 400 in it’s HTML5 compatibility.
PS Elements is with out a doubt the largest waste of money, even at $55. This comes from someone who pays $600 a year for a full Adobe CC subscription. If you want Photoshop, get Photoshop. Not Elements.
PS Elements is with out a doubt the largest waste of money, even at $55. This comes from someone who pays $600 a…