I will not rest until there actually is a Metropolitan Museum Of Taylor.
I will not rest until there actually is a Metropolitan Museum Of Taylor.
I’m sure it was a searing vision of brilliance from a ground-breaking genius auteur unrivaled in her time.
Could be worse. Could be a slide show.
Oh my God, who fucking cares?
This article reads like a ChatGPT vomit of “article about Stanley Tucci playing gay characters, written by a right wing stereotype of a liberal.”
Movie magic makes anything possible!
“ChatGPT vomit” - The AV Club
I obviously don’t want to be slaughtered like pigs by our new AI overlords, but it would be hilarious if the AI is “woke.” Right wingers would be so pissed.
Yes, after reading it 2-3 times and scratching my head, I came to the same conclusion. But that sentence (and several others) is anything but clear.
I mean...
Please, for your own sake, do not try to more deeply interpret the ravings of a modern AV Club content generator.
No they literally do use chatgpt
The article is atrociously written, but I think the “bad-faith acting” thing was intending to refer to the bad portrayals Tucci mentioned, rather than saying that any straight actor playing a gay part is inherently doing it in bad faith. (Not objecting to the overall point you’re making, but just trying to clarify…
They do seem to have a failing high-schooler’s grasp of social issues.
Yeah I agree with this sentiment. Sexuality is such a spectrum and nuanced - not just a binary - that I believe it’s disingenuous to say he can’t play gay because he doesn’t identify as gay; there is something that we can all pull from. You can also make an argument that rich actors shouldn’t play parts of poor…
I don’t know anything about this specific author, but I’m fairly certain AVClub has outsourced a lot of its writing (including some TV reviews) to high school sophomores who are a few points away from a D- and need the extra credit.
The only logical conclusion is that Stanley Tucci may only play the role of Stanley Tucci.