aray-han
Ray-Han
aray-han

There's another movie?!

Which is why it's hilarious to me someone is on here saying Hitchens was worse than Teresa. 

Hitchens had the integrity to admit he was wrong, and given that he had himself not committed war crimes or decided to attack Iraq, that’s relevant.

I share your core confusion. In the end, it’s a cultural thing. It’s another step, imo, in decoupling gender from sex, and asserting that they specifically don’t fit into the normative definitions of ‘man’ and ‘woman’.

I mean, they have a point. Relinquish the titles, cut off ties. Eat each other, royal family, please. 

That dude notoriously hates AOC, so no wonder he's comparing her to MTG. Proves how touched in the head he really is. 

Damn. Almost getting there. Gotta ramp up my efforts.

There's a reason Mr. Rogers didn't become a billionaire. 

They’re not aristos. So...

Given Biden is President right now, why should anyone 'let that shit go'? 

This is such an absurd scenario I have to assume you’re arguing in bad faith.

No, Israel is not ‘well within its rights’ to decide it will simply kill as many as Palestinians as it can to ‘stop Hamas’. That may be a tactical reality, but it sure as hell isn’t an ethical or legal one.

But that would have been unconstitutional. /s

Wizards of the Coast should sue her for trademark infringement.

The right to defend oneself does not include the right to murder civilians with impunity. You’re decrying extremists on both sides, when only one side has the unilateral power to change things. Consider WHY Hamas has such a stranglehold on Palestine. Consider what Israel gains by the continued existence of Hamas.

This is some amazing self-contradiction at work here. 

Ah, the reliable anti-Semitism canard. Always ready to appear whenever Israel's right to be brutal murderers is contested. 

Of course, that last paragraph doesn’t apply to Palestinians.

Wow, I never thought I'd agree with you on something so strongly. But this is the normalization of the logic of the veil, and that is a dark, dark path. You're exactly right about this being another version of 'well, what were you wearing?'. 

12 if the other person is under 18?!!!