aperture56
Aperture56
aperture56

There's a vending machine at my school (The School of the Art Institute of Chicago) that sells only tech stuff. CDs, DVDs, Film Editing supplies, Animation supplies, Arduino kits, LEDs, Batteries, supplies for neon lights, and more.

but it also depends on how far away you are from the screen. if you had an 8K projection on something 4 times the size of a normal screen, you'd probably be further away from the screen in order to see everything.

i'm pretty sure the screen is more than 20ft away tho. and what does the angle have to do with our perception of clarity of an object?

looks like someone ripped off jeff koons

Why is there no video!?

I hope they're not opening BS IMAX theatres. This makes me mad if they're making this many retro fitted theatres into IMAX theatres.

that movie is terrible...Gaspar Noe is an asshole...

i still think film (actually film, footage) of the Apollo launches look way better and more impressive.

They came out with facetime for your computer a long time ago.

Does your movie suck? Play it in reverse, make it profound.

Louis Vuitton designed a game board?

@zukny: use ca.gizmodo.com

#corrections last sentence of the first paragraph, own't should be won't

it seems like with this system you wouldn't be able to shoot anyone in the back...this makes it seem like you have to hit the other person's gun. unless there's vests i'm not seeing...this is stupid.

i just don't understand...why are photographers wasting their time in post production with obviously flawed models and terrible lighting? don't get me wrong, i think this is extremely empowering and it does show that no one is perfect, not even the gorgeous models we see in magazines etc, but i KNOW and have seen

woah buddy, get YOUR facts straight. you're putting words in my mouth now.

@KamWrex: watson gets the prompts via a text file, watson also isn't connected to the internet AT ALL. to get the answers watson has to rely on his own databank of knowledge.

yeah...but i actually read gizmodo as opposed to other crap because gizmodo writes ARTICLES! not tweets...this is a blog for TECH NEWS these people are paid to REPORT the TECH NEWS not tweet something they think is funny...

hey, if the link is that cool, then maybe they should actually talk about it, don't you think? as far as i'm concerned those little links are their references, their bibliography if you will. They do it so they don't get slammed with stealing. as far as i'm concerned this is all gizmodo wanted me to learn about the