in the grand scheme of Marvel? 6 episodes of Joey Gutierrez as a tertiary character in a show with a few million viewers is pretty obscure.

Others have speculated it was a shot towards the camera.

If any part of you is “grinning,” I think you’re the complete asshole in this situation.

I can definitely understand Baldwin feeling a tremendous amount of guilt for this, but the rest of your statement makes no sense to me. Assuming he was using the weapon as intended in the scene, how is this his fault? I can’t imagine it’s standard practice for actors to safety check their props. 

It’s crazy that Scott hadn’t seen this.

His parents’ surnames are Fiennes and Tiffin. Hero is the name of one of the characters in Much Ado About Nothing who herself was named after the Greek mythical character Hero (from the myth of Hero and Leander).

They grow back overnight(overday??) apparently (as the cult have to repull them when they get up)

I also sort of love each season Penn Badgley reminds audiences that Joe is not someone you want to fuck.

Him?

Please, Matt. His character’s name in Austin Powers was Johnson:

It’s getting frustrating. Mostly regarding Cheryl. The problem is that the show is so committed to doing monster-of-the-week episodes that it puts it’s primary storylines on the back-burner for too long and they just stagnate while the show rapidly introduces new mysteries and storylines and it’s all beginning to pile…

And if he’d looked at the very last words he’d know the publication date of the next issue.

“Ted Lasso isn’t the show that was ever going to deep-dive into the consequences of Sam taking a stand because that’s not the story it’s telling and the world it wants to build. Maybe you find that narratively dissatisfying, but I think that’s different altogether from it being a failure or a missed opportunity.”

You’re not wrong that writing criticism is a personal journey, but there’s no such thing as overthinking a show. Not everyone agrees with that: trust me, I’ve been living with this claim for over a decade now. But as someone whose literal job—and my second job—is to analyze media in a way that many would claim to be…

Back in Supergirl’s third season, the show started with a promising arc about Odette Annable’s Reign only to make a bizarre, disastrous late season swerve into an arc about Argo City instead.

Yeah, she would have easily been my choice for MVP this episode. She was in a ton of sketches, and managed to get laughs out of what was mostly the role of ‘straight woman’. She to me had the most Phil Hartman-like episode, though her desk piece was obviously something Phil could never do.

“That XXX’s anti-mask commenter turns out to neither be a parent nor from the school’s district is just one of a parade of funny ideas and performances that kept this everybody-in sketch rolling along nicely.”

“Unfortunately, as with all contemporary crime movies, there’s Shea Whigham to contend with” - is a pretty funny line. I’ll probably watch that one.

I don’t think Oliver comes off as self-righteous or a zealot. And even if we accept your premise as reality on the audience, there’s still value in educating or offering different perspectives or insight to people who broadly agree with you, or throwing a massive spotlight on an underserved but necessary to discuss…

Why on Earth would you start the story with a character who doesn’t show up until the second book? It’s necessary to see the fluidity of Seldon Plan working in order to feel the impact of its sudden failure.