XR Vyvanse, IR adderall.

This quote is the best description of Internet trolling I've yet to see. I will def be using this.

That's a fair statement.

Yeah it was probably only 1 70 a day now I really think about it. It was over 3 years ago and I would often take more but I said something to my husband and he was like “I’m pretty sure it was 1 70" and now that I reflect, 1 70mg vyvanse and 2 30mg adderalls. Still crazy amounts just less than I originally stated.…

So upon reflection I think it was 70mg of Vyvanse because it was one pill once a day and then 2 30mg instant release adderall. But it was still a shit ton and I most def. sometimes took more (and ran out and crashed, repeat next month).

Well sounds like you had a responsible doctor. I don’t know, like I said elsewhere, thinking about it makes me pissed as hell. Because I was definitely an addict and there were times I knew it was a problem but again, your doctor keeps prescribing it and I was a freaking addict so... But yeah, looking back I cannot…

I bet if you asked my husband he’d say I had some breaks. I’m so glad to hear you’re doing better now.

I wonder that too! Like isn’t there a recommended dosage she was just blatantly ignoring? The worst part was I was visibly suffering from clear signs of too much speed. I picked at my face and at one point my arms and chest (she asked, I told her mosquitos loved me). I barely slept. I couldn’t find a job (cause I was…

Honestly, not sure. It was absurd.

It can fuck you the hell up: it stole my 20's. I should have never been prescribed it (I do not have ADD, I procrastinate and was having difficulty adjusting to the rigor of University academics) and the psychiatrist who kept upping my dose should lose her license. No human being (especially not a 5'2" 22 year old…

Yeah I’ve come to regard him as a sort of a performance artist whose chosen milieu is commenting on Gawker media.

Point to Timothy Keith Heidenreich.

Wait you broke through and had like an honest, self-acknowledging conversation?

You’re looking at it!

I think part of it is that Gawker has gotten better at identifying tomato troll and identifying him/her has become sort of a game (one of my favorites) so maybe the thought is better fishing here? Also, Gawker doesn’t have as many new stories so if you’re hungry, Jezebel provides more opportunities.

That was my tomato you stole Timothy, and I demand you make restitution!

I have no problem with Judge’s ruling on the preliminary injunction - we’ll see what happens at the trial.

Innocent until proven guilty and accuser and accused/due process - hmmm, wonder where I got the idea we were discussing CRIMINAL allegations and not civil suits? It seems you’d like to shift the goalposts and claim your intial argument referred to civil suits and not criminal cases. Sure, though I suggest you read up…

No you are not reading my point correctly at all. I was attempting to point out the absurdity of your claim that women would use false rape allegations to get out of contracts. Rape charges are serious and require an extensive and very intrusive legal process and it is ridiculous to presume that women would adopt…

I know right? It would be so damn easy. All you’d have to endure is all that accompanies a sexual assault trial. Society in general is super cool to women claiming they’ve been raped/assaulted, especially by men in a position of power. You wouldn’t be asked intrusive questions about your personal life, you wouldn’t…