Won't lie: I am disappointed that this is merely a repackaging of a four-year old study and video. But I love those mannequins dancing, and they're much more awesome dancing in awkward silence without Business Insider's editing.

Now I want that girl to be important to the game. I want her to be a faction leader.

Darn right. I'm scrolling through, going "eh" about most of it, and then: GABRIEL KNIGHT. Didn't even know about it, but, um, hell yes.

Possibly Graal? http://classic.graalonline.com/

Sold! Well, I was already sold. Solder! Join some metal with heat in honor of this excellent surprise.

Hey, you asked why, not whether or not its dying was something to be lamented or not. I forgot to also mention their consistent misuse, rendering it more difficult for those who actually know what the distinction is to always remember which is which.

Because the lay/lie difference is frankly esoteric compared to things like to/too/two or there/their/they're. The difference is subtle and the meaning is sufficiently conveyed regardless of which the person uses, since the words mean virtually the same thing, so nobody (other than prescriptivists) cares. As the…

About a year before the film came out, I saw this show on TV. The basis of the show was that people would send in video or found footage that they were looking for more information about. Three videos were shown. I don't remember the first, and the third was about someone trying to identify and meet some woman in some…

I clicked because I hoped, based on the article title, that it was the theme done in actual duck quacks. It was not.

I don't like being that guy that makes a comment solely to correct on spelling, but this is just bugging me: It's "Don Juan".

Note: We accidentally hit publish on an early version of this draft with inadvertently incorrect information. We apologize for the error.

Square One was the best.

I don't care about Pokemon, but that is a damn pretty design.

So I proved your point that you're privileged and can't see past your own experience, and so you form straw man conclusions that generalise actual things that happen into things that form 100% of the daily experience of what you think I (or others) think men are like?

Sorry, too much rage. All I get is that you read what you expected, not what was said. As I have said in many other responses, I am not going after games. I mentioned in the context of games because this is a gaming site. Also, *I'm* toxic? I made a level-headed, calm, collected comment, and I get a response full of…

Good for you. It's nice to know that you're admitting that you don't really have an argument, but just 'know' you're right.

Okay cool you're a child who doesn't understand that the morals of a society are not a thing that comes from within a single person as an intrinsic thing, but the social mores that they are surrounded by, which only evolve via people deciding as a collective what are appropriate values to pursue.

Oh, yeah, there's laws against it. But only certain forms of it, and they're hard to enforce. Like I said, sexual harassment is often spun as complimentary, so therefore it's okay, from the perspective of the harasser. "She should've been happy for the attention" is seen as reasonable justification. But seeing as how…

Here's the problem with your story: it's just a story.

First, I'm not going after gamers. Representation in games is a symptom of a problem in the rest of society. I mention in the context of games because this is a gaming blog. Already said this elsewhere.