It’s a bit hard to say though. For an “Attorney at Law”, Catherine Z. Carty really can’t write for shit. I mean check out these garbage sentences:

Gotta be. How else can you explain that it’s not the Raiders this week? They gave up 228yds rushing to the Colts!!

Yeah me too -- it was like a moving game of where’s waldo. The structure that is supposed to hint where the pocket is, simply didn’t exist.

It does, however, show me what is on the front of his t-shirt, which is an advertisement for himself. Perfect.

The female woman appears to be wearing attire suitable for the ballpark.

There’s some aloe on Petchesky’s desk, you should use it.

The accomplishments are “meaningless” because ... his team is too good? He should go play for a worse team, so that you can appreciate his abilities. That seems like some fucked-up logic.

Wow!!

Wow

No Canadians on the list, that seems wrong.

I can’t believe I read all the way to that punchline, what is wrong with me?

The first comment you made about traveling, I assumed you were making an ironic joke. Now I think you may be genuinely angry about those kids on your lawn.

Boo.

If that was a fact, that would make it 22.5-28, and the defense would be good.

No that’s exactly how it’s always done.

Beautiful. Although, as I understand coach contracts, the eventual termination will have no effect on the dollars.

It seems like we’re wandering into some kind of legalistic argument here. You use words like “predatory” and “reckless” and I say “intent to hurt” and we’re not talking about the same thing? Does “reckless” mean they can’t “intend” to injure because they just aren’t thinking? I don’t know if that’s a good defence.

It’s true, I think previous crimes should count for something. I actually think DOPS has a roughly consistent philosophy, even if I don’t agree with it. 

That’s LITERALLY blaming the victim!

You gotta be kidding. The hockey play (the body check) was long over when he threw him to the ice.