Eh, I don’t know. I think he’s going for some approximation of the 80s/90s teased/feathered look. I’m not about to read too much into the hairstyle given the way he tends to draw hair. If anything, I’d assume it’s more a matter of how his art style has changed than an attempt to actually make it look modern.
Suzaku
amaranth-sparrow
...why does it have skin?
Technically a cyborg. And, yes, the androids are clearly fashion conscious. At least the ones who used to be human.
Well, I think it’s pretty obvious that a big reason for her inclusion was the low number of female characters in DB and the need to diversify the roster.
Disagree, she clearly has a late 80s / very early 90s aesthetic with the teased hair and dress. Sure, it’s not quite in the big fluffy hairstyle all those workout girls Roshi always watched, but imo it’s clearly what Toriyama was going for.
Are you in some sort of “say as much stupid shit as possible” contest that I’m not aware of? If so, you’re probably in the lead.
I don’t think you understand that hiring more people to work on tackling toxicity doesn’t solve the problem of having to divert resources away from developing core game features. Those hires could have been aimed at core game features. There is always an opportunity cost because you only get to spend each dollar and…
There is never a situation where the resources spent on developing the console reporting system couldn’t have been spent on other features. Even if they hired 50 new employees, those are 50 employees they could have had developing new maps and heroes if they weren’t working on this.
Obviously it’s completely within their rights to strike any video that is not demonstrably transformative, which means most LPs and streams. And let’s get real, you and I both know the real reason for the DMCA takedown.
Hardly. This guy is new on the scene and likely brought a deck he didn’t have much experience with because the format requires it.
My posts sure did go nuts for some reason.
Nah. This guy is fairly new to the tournament scene and is likely inexperienced with this particular deck/class, but brought it because the format requires you to play multiple classes.
Depends on the board. I only ever visit /tv/ and /co/ these days, which seems to stay pretty apolitical. /pol/ is definitely an alt-right centric board, though, and those users tend to bleed into some of the other boards. Of course there are also boards like /lgbt/ and /cgl/ which people always overlook in these…
It’s getting hard to keep track of all the words, symbols, and pictures that are supposed to be offensive.
No, but they used copyright law to remove a video not because it violated copyright, but because they disagreed with the content in the video.
I don’t want to alarm you, but this website is also reporting on this subject because they want clicks for more ad revenue.
Hah! This guy gets it! PICKLE RICK!!! Know what I mean? Probably not, this show’s just too deep for some guys. Wubbalubbadubdub!
They’re absolutely in their right to issue a DMCA takedown of any video that uses their intellectual property in a way that isn’t demonstrably transformative.
I wholeheartedly disagree with this use of DMCA claims. Yes, it’s within their right to file a DMCA on any YouTube or Twitch video that isn’t demonstrably “transformative.”