“Article about J.R.R. Tolkien is shorter than his longest book”. “Documentary about Stanley Kubrick is shorter than his longest film.”

Oh yay. The inflated price scam joint again. Well, at least it’s not ALSO Wata.

I mean, the Whispers were weird, but I kinda liked them as a fourth wall commentary about the nature of remaking games. We also didn’t know what their payoff was until the last hour of the game. That payoff was part of the whole “going off the rails” thing.

It’s like people skipped the entire last three hours of the game. It baffles me that anyone who played remake missed the fact that this is NOT just a retelling of the original story. 

But it actually looks like they’ve done a lot to deal with the poor translations.

Yeah did you...not play Remake?

It wasn’t that difficult to infer after the events of Remake alone. 

I thought that cover of Toxic was actually really well used.

“There’s simply no room for the virtuous in Fargo”

I remember reading that reviewers who like Trump hate this season.  Boy do I see why, honestly I'm fine with that.  This isn't an era of subtlety. 

Riff on the money-tracker in No Country for Old Men.

A recent poll on a 70,000 member Scott Pilgrim community returned a 93% positive reaction from fans on this netflix series.. the “backlash” are just from a vocal minority of people who complain and whine online. The creator of the Scott Pilgrim has already stated this is an alternate universe/timeline, which affords…

The jumping on point is the movie

As we have it, we have a show with no almost no character development from the named protagonist

Ehhhh, it’s arguably closer to a sequel than an adaptation. The first episode is an adaptation, everything after is a sequel taking place in the same chronological space, like, the present day scenes in Back to the Future 2

Nega Scott, a physical manifestation of all of Scott’s flaws, down to short gags

I couldn't get into Futurama because John Futurama never showed up *once*.

This is a hilarious instance to get upset about what you’re claiming though. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is already a deliberate attack on the straight white male protagonist. Scott Pilgrim is not a likable character (that was a big part of why I had mixed feelings about the movie). The point is that he’s a selfish…

People incapable of character growth hate character growth. 

They already said it ends at the Forgotten Capital. And I think they confirmed Cid will be in it as a guest character. So for this theory to be true they have to be lying about something or they’ve made major changes to the sequence of events.