I don’t see how this is in any way a positive showing of marriage-worthiness. It’s downright creepy and submissive and harkens back to the day when women were a man’s property. It’s like this guy got a certificate from the local vet saying that his stallion is in fine breedin’ shape, and worthy of being sold.

But why should anyone be making sexual-related promises to their parents (and then following it up with evidence)? Not only this, but the whole ‘Promise Ring’ nonsense that the Jonas brothers kicked off (and gleefully abandoned the moment they realized how easily they could get laid).

Yes, Kim is very sad about her unfortunate life.

Might as well commission a fucking granite carving of a cake. It would taste about as pleasant.

UGH. I bet he would be seeeeeriously pissed if that family member aborted his rape baby, too. Because preciousness of life (except in the case of adult women)!

Meanwhile, Toronto’s subways will proudly display ads for anyone who’s got a few thousand bucks burning a hole in their pockets.

“Perhaps the only silver lining to this story is that Mohsen was offered a job at a soccer school in Spain.”

But hey, remember back in 1998-99, when everyone shit their dicks at the teaser trailers, some weeping openly at how incredible Episode I was going to be?

-Supple
-The Head
-Haircut
-Skullet
-Bald Albino Lesbian
-Hairacist
-Baldouche

Male comedians do this just as much, as self-deprecation has been a solid form of humour forever. It tends to be the least offensive type of humour since you’re not punching down or insulting anyone else, and in that sense it’s also the safest for a general audience. Although it’s by no means Amy’s only style, as…

The way we’re headed right now, over the next 50 years it’s probably going to be a choice between nutritionally disadvantageous lab meat or mass famine and ecological devastation. We need this (or something akin to this) to survive as a species, so this is at least the right direction to head.

The small tax increases it would take to keep these places open would not irreparably harm the middle/upper class. Nor would they likely even feel it. But poor people (of any colour) won’t likely vote Republican, so why spend money to do anything that might help them vote for the other guys? This is just good…

Just as a politician who was shilling for a corporation or other interest group is found to have financial stakes or received bribes would and should be outed, the same goes here. I think it’s a fair rule.

Oh I understand, but it also needs to be a reasonable demand in the first place. Like, can I petition that the church be relocated 500 miles from its current location, but okay, let’s settle on 250 because that’s compromising? There are many streets around that block that are not affected by this potential bike lane,…

I agree about compromise, but in this case it reeks of NIMBYism on the church’s part. A quick google maps search shows that 6th street is a fairly major thoroughfare (6 lanes, 2 of which seem to be dedicated to parking at least some of the time), which could more than accommodate a bike lane, and the church is on a…

Yeah, sorry but no. Not only does a public roadway not fall under the umbrella of religious freedom, the magic thing about bikes is you can bike around a cone anyways so this solution is cute but ultimately pointless. The church likely just wants its patrons to be able to double park (which is actually illegal I might…

But logistically impossible. If there’s a bike lane there, it’ll get used. Unless you propose traffic cops sit there and ticket cyclists on church days (while ignoring the double parking church ladies’ cars because RELIGIOUS FREEDOMS).

Removing parking and narrowing roads is actually a legitimate city planner’s tool for discouraging drivers and making transit a more palatable option. I hope they keep this lane.

You know all of this is going right into some horrible storyline on their garbage show. There will be many close ups of crying Kardashians.

Awful quality, but relevant.