Is this a George W. Bush video? He just said “nu-cu-ler.”

In what way does calling for the removal of a logo you agree is racist cheapen or make more difficult the loss you are currently enduring?

The video is fun but the “shocking” opening premise is ridiculous. Of course New York City’s population density is lower than Paris — it includes Queens, Brooklyn, the Bronx, and Staten Island! Manhattan’s population density on its own, which is what we all think of when we think of New York being dense, is…

DURRRR STICK TO SPORTS DURRRR

But Burneko’s hilarious burns on the failed presidential candidates are cool?

Most of these are very tenuous, if even correlated at all.

Poring over high school tape.

Is it just me or is the saga of Hingle McCringleberry becoming more like real life?

FYI, it was not the Irving, Texas, branch of BSA that was sued. It was the national organization that is headquartered in Irving.

This guy’s commentary is the Upworthy of nature videos.

So, I know I’m going to be excoriated for this, but I ask in all honesty, how is this that big a deal? A couple of points of thought:

These takes are getting progressively cold.

There is not “no liability” until the judgment you refer to is final. The judgment is not yet final!

What’s the point of going to law school if you can’t be a pompous dick about it??

You are confusing Williams’ chances at legal success for the actual ability he has to litigate them. Until the appellate court no longer has jurisdiction to consider the appeal, the dismissal of GM from the suit is NOT FINAL. Therefore, there is POTENTIAL LIABILITY. You are absolutely correct that there WILL be no…

It is nice that you have a definition of “liability” that differs from the legal one. I wish your characterization were possible and true! I can assure that however well-counseled Williams is, that has no bearing on whether he will appeal or not for any number of reasons, the least of which is he may be a proud man…

Like I explained to another commenter, if Mitchy takes an appeal against all defendants, which can’t happen until the district court finishes up with the defendant still in the case, GM is still part of the active litigation notwithstanding the dismissal. Thus, until judgment is rendered and the window for appeal…

Good question. If Mitchy appeals the summary judgment in favor of GM, which he most likely will, then it could still be considered ongoing litigation notwithstanding the dismissal, and thus a liability.

It’s a murky thing to get into what are the real motivations for corporate conduct when there’s no way we will ever know. If the liability shit was completely fabricated, I think we will know pretty quickly because there would be no point in deleting the others when posts like this replace them.