They are most probably duplicated, both on top and at the bottom. The bottom one will only work with the boot open.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the rear indicators are actually duplicated (both on the top and lower taillights). There are rules which states that rear indicators and brake lights must be visible at all times, even with the boot open. Some cars replicate them inside instead of outside:

Ah, could be that.

I do not understand why Alfa Romeo isn’t dead last.

Also safest for the children.

🤔

Maybe... but in a sports saloon it should be near the top.

True but very rarely are those cars sold with the original badges outside of their home market and in many cases they are dedicated models.

Oh sorry, I thought it was overall height.

The XE is at least on par with the 3 Series, maybe superior dynamically. And it still doesn’t sell unfortunately.

Aren’t 17cm like 6+ inches? Because that is the height difference between the Venza and the Arteon.

This is easily six-and-a-half inches lower than a Venza. It’s a completely different concept.

It is funny you mention the C4 Cactus, in which the innovation comes from having some rubber bubbles on the door and saying in a press release that it was specifically engineered to never go over 190km/h. That car is an affront to Citroën.

Well misunderstood! The “hatchback boot opening” is counted as a door. That doesn’t mean the doors through which the passenger usually get in and out of the cars are hatches.

Nope, if it opens with the glass it’s a door. It doesn’t matter in which direction it opens.

E-Pace with a lower ride height, job done. Sell three, become the new Rover.

I don’t know, BMWs have lost a bit of the dynamic edge they used to have and they still sell like hot cakes...

800-900k cars is what Audi / Daimler / BMW sell in all of Europe. It is probably skewed towards small cars but not all of them are B or C segment hatchbacks.

Checked it and it doesn’t. It’s the engine from the Golf R.

This is what you are thinking about: