I’m wondering how many of our comments will be hidden. Alconleigh’s disappeared from my feed, so here’s her comment:

It’s pretty impressive how she’s tanked her entire career in one tweet. It’s not like the sort of people who read her work have short memories.

Shall I continue?

Serious question for Natasha: if Roy had contacted you with these pictures and told you that he was attempting to blackmail one of the women but they wouldn’t pay him, would you have published his pictures of the woman in question and kept his identity secret?

We've seen your Twitter Natasha. You have no issues protecting people who sexually prey on others.

Natasha, you just wrote that: “Stories don’t need an upside. Not everyone has to feel good about the truth. If it’s true, you publish.” However, this story involves a plea of “no contest,” thereby rendering these ALLEGATIONS unproven. Your headline implies that all of these accusations have been proven in a court of…

Now they’re just actively baiting people.

He should have filmed the executives of Gawker’s competitors.

There ought to be a picture of you right next to the dictionary definition of hypocrisy. You’re the human personification of Feminism Lite.

This is almost as bad as outing a man’s personal life when it has no value to society, and then pretending it didn’t happen by dismissing all negative comments to hide the outrage, and then NOT FIRING JORDAN SARGENT.

Are any of the victimized women closeted homosexuals? Please follow your usual policy and provide a list.

This is Good job.

Why not post their names? I mean if it’s true, then publish, right?

Warning, this was posted on Gawker...

Jezebel spoke to two of the women who were secretly filmed by Roy; we are protecting their identities while they pursue legal action.

The irony of this post is amazing.