You sound like a fantastic father and professor.

And yes, I do see the part where his full name is listed. But you know full well that wasn't the point I was making.

k, bro. I don't think you realize that I'm making fun of you. Never in my life have I seen/heard someone refer to Dave Grohl as "David". His fucking Wikipedia page even says Dave. I understand that his legal name is likely David, but what was particularly funny about your use of his full name is that it was clearly…

omg like actually his name is David? im like, so embarrassed right now.

Lol "David Grohl".

I hope it wins everything! It's so good.

Taylor Swift wasn't snubbed by the establishment (LOL she's all they ever wanted in life). '1989' won't qualify until next year.

"Dating a "musician" sounds romantic, I know, until you find out it's less candlelit serenading and more listening to the same riff from "Sweet Child O' Mine" with varying effects over and over. "

P.E. teachers are the worst. The amount of shit I witnessed/was subjected to in high school gym classes. A male p.e. teacher openly mocked a (15 year old) girls cellulote and weight while we were running and I called him on it. Result: threatened with suspension for "lying".

There's something really wrong when its this easy for Charles Manson to get married (easy as in the law doesn't really preclude it), yet same-sex couples have to fight tooth and nail for the same rights. Because Charles & Star are clearly going to honour and cherish the ideals of "traditional marriage".

YES. I will not at all be surprised if he was secretly recording this abuse via that creepy bear. Ugh.

Earlier this week, fans noticed iTunes was offering a new track from Swift's upcoming album 1989, simply titled "Track 3." Despite the fact that it was only time length of the song was listed as :09 (and, if anyone bothered to preview it, was nothing but white noise), enough fans shelled out $1.29 for it to vault…

She announced that her new single would be available that day only to people who had pre-ordered the whole album and, as you should know, with pre-ordered albums on iTunes, individual singles download as they become available and you're charged for them as they download. So we're not just a bunch of Taylor Swift…

So you're truly sticking to your story that she chose to put people at risk of Ebola because she's so crazy about weddings (women, amirite?). Like she actively was like WHO DA FUQ CARES ABOUT EBOLA?! I need to get this wedding planned! Because that's how everything you've written on this sounds. It's fucking absurd.

Hysteria is certainly going to happen no matter what, but that doesn't mean that it's responsible to the stoke its fires. This story and the story you posted yesterday on this topic are just unnecessary. The angle you've chosen to approach this issue from is so deeply entrenched in hysteria that it's almost laughable.…

Sorry, I didn't think so either but I wasn't quite sure how to word it. But I think I understand what you mean, in any case.

I'm not intending this to be a fight, either. My correcting you is not meant as a personal slight. Perhaps Indian people in the West Indies prefer East Indian as a way of distinguishing themselves from West Indian people. That makes sense, I guess. All I'm saying is that it's generally not the preferred term for the…

Preferred by whom? I'm sorry, but just because a lot of people refer to us that way, doesn't make it correct. I've run into this issue a lot with people from the U.S., but it's wrong regardless of where you're from. I'm from Vancouver, which has a huge Indo-Canadian population, and people constantly use East Indian to…

Yeah, it's just a super inaccurate and slightly offensive way of referring to Indian people as a whole. India is huge! I'm distinctly not East Indian as my ancestors are from Southern India. The whole Christopher Columbus thing was bullshit, but most people should know better by this point.

She's not East Indian.