aimeepond
AimeePond
aimeepond

No, but I certainly thought I was gonna see a bunch of funny memes in here.

Disney’s New Tron

The quality’s shit, but:

That’s not a betrayal. That’s what he would have signed on for. That’s what signing meant. That is the whole point of signing on—to allow the UN to decide when and where to go and what to do there. You can’t sign on to that and then say never mind 12 hours later.

I don’t agree with you. Also, the best part was:

He could have simply been the reasonable Cap he’s always been (outside of the horrific Civil War) and signed up. Then the bomb happens with Bucky implicated. Cap is ready to go after him, but the UN tells him to stand down. They’ll handle it because there’s no intention on bringing him in alive. This doesn’t sit well

I thought they were going there a little bit when she said “please recognize me” to Bucky when she was getting choked, and I couldn’t figure out why he would recognize her/care about her.

Well something the movies haven’t addressed and irks me because they haven’t is that Black Widow is Russia’s equivalent of Captain America, she was part of a program that enhanced her strength, reflexes and retarded her aging, so that a woman in her 20's could conceivably be a cold war operative. Also not

The thing that separates this from BvS, and why I’ll accept everyone being an idiot is the relationships between all the characters. If love makes fools of us all, friendship makes bad decision-makers of us all too.

I sided with Cap because, even though both sides had points, Cap’s team seemed to have more honest motivations. They believed in what they were fighting for. Iron Man was blame-sharing. Black Panther was out for revenge. Spider-Man wanted to impress Stark. War Machine was following orders. Widow was taking the path of

He only interceded because they outright said they weren’t trying to bring him in for a fair trial. It was a kill mission. Cap isn’t going to stand by and let that happen to anyone, friend or foe.

You realize that your idealized scenario for Cap going rogue has the exact same problem that you’re saying the movie started with, right? You don’t like that Cap says his opinion is the only one he can trust. In your version, Cap offers lip service that he’s going to play ball, but then the instant push comes to

Tony’s support of the Accords seemed to be less about what 127 countries wanted and more about himself. He flat-out said that he needed to be controlled because he can’t stop himself. He was trying to lay the Ultron fiasco off as an Avengers issue rather than his personal mistake. To me, his entire argument boiled

It’s funny, because everyone here in the comments who’s siding with Iron Man is completely ignoring that bit of Cap’s dialogue from the movie and part of me is wondering if maybe they showed two slightly different movies to different audiences.

But Cap was 100% wrong. He cock-blocked every option that would have worked and was responsible for all the escalation in the movie

So he should sign up for the Accords so that he could break the Accords? His reservations about signing on, which make perfect sense in the context of his experience in the MCU, are realized in the first 24 hours, and he immediately compromises his own integrity by breaking his word...and that’s the way he should have

I sided with Captain America. He did not want himself or the team to be a weapon that is deployed only when it aligns with someone else’s political agenda.

BP was on a laser-focused revenge mission, right up until he learned he was wrong, and was able to re-examine and stand down rather than continue to let (the now hollow) revenge drive him.

Therein lies the beauty. I am team cap but thought tony was being the idiot. But when you see either story you empathise with both. Tony is an idiot for jumping on the accords, but tries every step of the way to compromise with cap. Cap is an idiot for keeping his mouth shut about the paycho assassins and bucky, but