Can we just graft this top onto that car?

Shitters....I was hoping it would have made it to the North San Joaquin Valley site in CA

I own a said NA6 and I do plan to do said things to it, minus the side impact protection because that was pretty much just the seatbelt tower brace and that effs up what storage space there is in the car. You're right, money could be spent elsewhere, but there is definitely some sort of weird appeal to a car that can…

The 1.6 (without the crank issues) will have a special place in automotive history if there are enough survivors over the years.

Low maintenance? Lulz

The Buick V8 or the bespoke V8 whose development essentially finally did Rover in? (Not trying to be snarky, serious question)

Yes but the problem being is that if there isn't an aftermarket and certain companies don't keep a stock of parts. That's where the complexity problem comes into play.

Lamborghini has already run into this electrical problem as detailed by road and track and on this website. If you need a new computer, you're SOL and you can't break the old one apart and fix it in your garage.

Well true, but I wouldn't trust anyone to not void the warranty if absolutely anything on the drivetrain died. They could reasonably say "aftermarket exhaust, more power, out of tolerances, not warranty"

And violate your gold plated warranty the second you touch the exhaust.

Because it was recommended by a Jalop author. They're all Gawker sites, just don't click on the headline.

Nissan tried to do that with the Z cars and that didn't go over too well, which I believe was covered on this site somewhere.

These pictures are absolutely unadulterated car porn.

The Webers were homologated by Jaguar back in the day, but Lucas mechanical fuel injection remains on the option's list for those looking for a challenge. Either way, the Lightweight will have more than 300 horsepower and 280lb ft at 4,500 rpm.

You know, with Uber X you can get picked up by literally anything? It could be a 10 year old Prius (Like I was picked up in in San Francisco). It doesn't really make a difference between Uber X and Lyft besides Lyft markets to people who aren't already some kind of taxi driver.

Way of the future, or assholes who undermine a system that's been in place for years and play dirty with competitors?

Yeah, sure, it can be charged, but this isn't murder.

No, that's called manslaughter, or accidental manslaughter, or any number of other things except for murder, which specifically implies intent. You understand those things are different right?

Your comment doesn't address a single thing I said. You are saying that Stewart DELIBERATELY tried to run him over. That he wanted to commit murder. There is a huge gap between having a violent outburst and swinging at someone or throwing a helmet or kicking a car and deliberately trying to run them over.