ahmille4
Anthony Miller
ahmille4

Spoken like a true keyboard warrior. Inside the car is much different than out on the track. I'm not saying that Stewart didn't try and scare him by maybe gunning it when passing him but there is a chance that he misjudged where he was on the track when it happened. Track lighting is consistently complained about

Because CVTs can die in a fire

Yeah, that pesky safety stuff...

Here's all the relevant information you need in one convenient table. Take a look through it and I'll go over what's interesting tucked away in it.

Yeah you're correct. I have always screwed up this notation since basic physics and I have consistently failed to get myself to break the habit.

Ok, so assuming the 2000 lb/ft and your numbers are correct, that still means the Tesla is looking at 800lb/ft of torque. WWWWWOOOOOWWWWWWWWWW

This is the most dumb thing I have ever witnessed in my entire life.

That is true, except for the case in with the orphan cars. The same thing happened when Plymouth, Mercury, and Olds were axed. All of those vehicles were low risk finance jobs for a little while due to the fact that their parent companies still existed and were still replete with dealerships that carried multiple

DAT BODY ROLL

Regarding the Pontiac, (and it's saturn friend), all GM dealerships will service them and easily to boot. They all came from the same parts bin.

Mostly because the clownshoe is a nicer drive. The M roadster was considered too hot and jumpy for it's own good. I foresee this becoming a classic in many years because people don't think much of it now and there will be fewer left in the future that people stare at at shows. In regards to driving, it will

I would go on this so hard.

What would be wonderful, if it could be done on the Kappa platform. That would be a great little platform for a small caddy

So it's a wagon, since technically a shooting brake has two doors.

Additionally, with everything everyone else said, there is no "bounce" in a car accident. The bounce you may see in a head on wreck is energy transfer from one vehicle to another, typically caused by one vehicle carrying more kinetic energy than the other. The "bounce" of one car moving backwards after the wreck

Those resonator tubes are the best way to circumvent this issue without going an artificial route. At least they aren't reproducing the sound.

True, but if the weight stayed reasonably the same (about 4000) pounds, it's reasonably in line with a modern CL65 Benz (which is about 4800! pounds). I have yet to hear that car isn't sporty. With modern shocks, dampers, and springs plus the engine out of the m6, that would be fantastic.

Ah, but imagine that with today's tech? mmmmmhhmmmmmmm

BMW 8 series of course

Protect the President!