aerwteb
asdfbgf
aerwteb

The show's premise is now entirely irrelevant. This could be any other "wacky" sitcom and it's becoming a chore to sit through every week.

I don't see that happening, but the general rule in regards to elections is that a low voter turnout essentially means that Republicans win as a result of gerrymandering.

A) Bernie didn't steal any delegates from Nevada. Hillary's delegates literally didn't show up to vote. B) You've constructed an argument based on your own invention of what a Bernie supporter is and you're projecting it onto me. I've never said anything in regards to what I think of superdelegates or the delegate

No, I don't think the average Republican voter is a moron. I just think they'll vote for a Republican over Clinton. Every favorability poll I've ever seen taken among Republicans shows she's massively disliked by that sector of the country. Given the way Fox has run the email scandal non-stop for the entirety of a

Wisconsin
Colorado
Nevada
New Hampshire

Great. Look it up on your own time. The initial premise of your original post was in reference to questioning Clinton's judgement as opposed to Sanders' judgement; if you haven't seen the differences between the two in regards to which adheres to a strict set of moral, progressive, truly liberal principles such as

As evidenced by what I said above, it's really not. She's made a career of flip-flopping on major progressive issues when it benefits her politically. That's all the portrayal is referencing.

I'm at a loss for what you're trying to say here.

Look, I'm not some conspiracy theorist. I'm not saying she has people killed. I'm saying she remembers who supports her and doesn't support her and acts accordingly. You're throwing up a straw man in order to invalidate my statement without having to reconcile with it.

It shows a lack of a set of core beliefs and a lack of foresight. When Clinton opposed gay marriage until 2013, that showed a lack of liberal values. When she voted to expand the Bush tax cuts in 2005, when she voted in favor of the Iraq war, when she voted in favor of the Wall Street bailout without proper measures

Look, if you have issues with Sanders' supporters, that's fine, but don't project them all onto me. Kasich and Ryan run about even with Sanders, as opposed to Clinton where they defeat her handily. "Swing-voters" have largely gone in favor of Sanders given the fact that he's won in almost every swing state in this

Oh, you were quoting the article. The "maniacal" part is obviously a part of the caricature the show is playing up. All I was saying is that she's proven herself several times over the course of this campaign to be willing to flip on just about anything if it's politically expedient.

When did I say "maniacally driven"? And I'd stay away from attacking a candidate based on appearance. It's not conducive to a substantive discussion, and it's also just generally gross.

Have we devolved to this? And which is it? Am I a secret neocon or a sexist Sanders supporter?

The voters will certainly be angry, but the Republican party has made it clear that they don't care about who the voters want to elect. If the Republicans end up with another candidate, the voter base will absolutely turn out to vote, if only because Hillary has been so demonized by the right wing for so long.

I'm a gay liberal, Captain, and I despise Mr. Rove just as much as the next homo. If you want an in-depth recounting of the repercussions of the Clinton administration, the differences between the Sanders administrations approach to the crime bill as opposed to the Clinton approach (which I've detailed in elsewhere;

I'm inclined to side with the second suggestion, though not because they're "without integrity". They believe, like everyone else within the Democratic party, that Clinton will be the eventual nominee and don't want to cross her given her history for crushing opposition later down the line.

That was the one time she used it, and she was not specific. She used a racially-charged pejorative and apologized for it 30 years later. There were very real racial consequences of the legislation advocated for by both Clintons during the Clinton administration and brushing them off because they weren't overt or

Also, I wouldn't bet on Clinton being insurmountable in the general. Almost every head-to-head match-up poll shows that she'd lose to someone like John Katich (some show she'd even lose to Cruz) and if the Republican primary does end with a brokered convention and they nominated someone like Paul Ryan (which is