aerwteb
asdfbgf
aerwteb

Their being just over 200 delegates apart in pledged delegates (including super delegates in your percentage like you just did there is disingenuous seeing as how they'll switch over if he takes the lead in the pledged delegate count like they did with Obama back in 2008), him coming back from a 50-point national

And conservative representatives were labeling black youths as "superpredators" as a form of scapegoating and Clinton went along with it.

As I've said elsewhere, the term was well known as a racial pejorative. She advocated for the crime bill at length and dismissed the criticism it garnered. If we're looking to compare the two candidates, as someone else has already pointed out at length, Sanders heavily criticized the bill's racist undertones and

The term was well-understood to be a racial pejorative and she used it describing youths with "no conscious[es] and no empathy", which is pretty hideous rhetoric. The fact that it took her 20 years to apologize for it is pretty telling.

That NY Daily News interview has been spun as some sort of revelatory piece of journalism that exposed that Sanders doesn't actually know what he's talking about, but A) the interviewer asked questions that were nonsensical and then attempted to claim that Sanders didn't understand when it was clear the interviewer

"There was nothing in the bill that targeted blacks" - I'd suggest you read Michelle Alexander's piece in The Nation and rethink that claim (http://www.thenation.com/ar… .

Then, frankly, you haven't been paying attention. In the last debate alone, she attempted claim she had been supporting a $15 minimum wage hike all along when she'd only been advocating for a $12 minimum wage throughout the entire campaign. It was so transparent, she was booed. In the beginning of the campaign, she

Yes, since she spearheaded the movement to get the bill passed while calling young black individuals "superpredators" while ignoring criticism of these measures, a significant amount of it coming from the Congressional Black Caucus and, yes, Bernie Sanders.

Spot on. Most people look to "yes" or "no" votes and consider that the be-all and end-all and politics is more complicated than that.

No, you're right. It's been annoying for a long time, but it's even more nonsensical now given current the state of the race.

It's clear that the SNL writers aren't really paying attention to what's happening in the political race, at least not in a substantive way. The candidates are caricatures based on media narrative alone. This whole "Bernie is an idealist who doesn't know how to achieve what he wants to achieve" is idiotic to anyone

I always resented this show because of the way HBO fucked Looking over in favor of renewing their other ratings bomb that just happened to focus on privileged straight people, but I'm glad HBO at least allows their canceled programs to attempt to have some semblance of closure as opposed to NBC's "destroy anything

I'm surprised that this episode has been embraced the way it has because, while a few of the gags worked, I wasn't even remotely impressed by anything relating to Smithers' "coming out". A few people overheard him singing a song about his love for Burns and then he's immediately out, the entire hook of the episode

I'm having trouble discerning which one of those dopes is meant to be the lone "cute" one.

I won't explore these so-called "easter eggs" and I don't appreciate being told to, Dean.

This cinched it for me: I'm seeing this nonsense. Watching Charlize Theron screech in the first one was probably the most fun I had in a theater in 2012 (aside from, you know, legitimately good movies) and this time it comes with Emily Blunt and Jessica Chastain.

Sophie's Choice is an okay movie with an amazing central performance. Either way, I'm one of the few people in the world who didn't enjoy the original Ghostbusters, so I'm inclined to side with you.

There are literally dozens of us!

I'm shocked that there are other Logan-apologists out there. I thought I was the only one.