adampallydin
AdamPallydin
adampallydin

This review reminded me of the text-box you see on a lot of Wikipedia articles: “This section may be overly detailed.” Listing every beat of the episode’s plot one after the other gets tiring to read, and aside from saying that Bella Ramsey is “credibly American” I have almost no sense of whether the acting is good

What fucking “goalposts”? She’s doing what she wants, and what she wants can change. You sound like a sociopath.

I think that idea comes with age and experience. Especially when and if you have kids. There is a time in your late teens though mid 30s where maybe you believe knowing something that someone else doesn’t makes you more interesting or better but, like the comic shows, you find eventually that someone saying “I never

Your choice to purchase, or not to purchase, this game has absolutely no impact on Rowling.”

just ignore it and it’ll pass over time”

It is ridiculously naive, but not less so your claim that it doesn’t matter. It isn’t like somewhere, abstractly, up the line there is a bad actor here: JK Rowling is a prominent part and directly benefits. Much more so than most scenarios, and she has used her influence to continue to hurt trans people. It also isn’t

People aren’t “looking for reasons” to be angry. People are rightfully angry over transphobia, and this game is based on the franchise created by one of the world’s most visible transphobes. And fuuuuuuuuuck you and your stance of “ignore it and it’ll go away”. That’s not how social change works. The trans community

When there are so many real problems with this game... this weird non-news piece comes of really strange and dismissive of them. A one coin skin is not an actual problem. It’s just not. And yes the text acknowledges this (but in an awkward and kinda tone deaf “lol I’m so quirky isn’t ocd cute and not actually an

My gf was mocking me just the other day: “He’s got ult, hes got ult!” lmao like cmon. He did have Ult.

Even a site like Kotaku is beholden to writing articles that are guaranteed to bring in traffic and clicks, and right now, whether we like it or not, Modern Warfare II is a pretty hot topic that people are actively searching for. It sucks, but that’s the way it is.

Not bad. You held it together for 4 whole sentences before you let your inner child out. Might have been able to make a salient point ... but no, you had to go to childish insults, which just totally cut the legs off from anything else you might have said.

There’s nothing more pathetic than some incel simping for Musk. Seek help.

Old assets” Not including the new characters and skins they use.
Not including all the new dialogue/VO for it.
Look, I’m all for critique but at least make it honest. The old mode used just about the same amount of ‘existing assets’, beat for beat.

Seems they have been deleting comments on all the Blizz articles that call out the slanted angles and missing info in their ‘reporting’. Happened to me too. I can see them in my history but not in the actual commentary. Aside from potential Kinja bugs I can only surmise that they get a lot of clicks from feeding the

It was, so this is what my old comment said:

Was my comment deleted...?

I’m still confused about what makes Overwatch 2's model any different from other f2p games, and how come we’re giving those games zero scrutiny, and Overwatch 2 all of it.

From a friend who used to work there I am told the problem with Blizzard is there is always push from on high for things that really shouldn’t be. And you either have people who are managing the project that push back and say whats realistic or people who don't. My guess is Jeff pushed back and the people in charge

I disagree. A good team cannot hold itself together when they have no control over the timeline. Nor can a good leader of course but my point is that the current issue is more likely due to the desire to get OW2 out racking all that money as early as possible than it is about the quality of Kaplan’s leadership or the

User name checks out.