It’s just a color name, and it’s a good color. The issues you bring up have merit generally, but you’re stretching in this case.
It’s just a color name, and it’s a good color. The issues you bring up have merit generally, but you’re stretching in this case.
Not sure how serious or facetious you’re being, but the whole point is to expand their appeal beyond hard-core GM loyalists.
The “First-ever” BMW 4 Series made me laugh. They literally renamed a product line.
My curmudgeonly instinct is telling me this is a perfect example of GM phoning it in. While there’s a lot to like in certain individual details, the whole thing as a package is obviously lacking. Holistically, it’s simply not competitive. Looking at the pictures and reading the descriptions, I can only wonder how GM…
Except it’s not. You could get an SRX with a third row in 2009.
first-ever
The ATS handled better than a 3 Series and it got a ton of praise for it, but it wasn’t as good of a car overall. The interior was much much worse, the engines just weren’t as good, and the overall features/options were lagging. Yes, the chassis was really good, but as a whole, it couldn’t beat the 3 Series; I mean I…
Are... are they just fucking with us?
The average new car price this year is about $37k. Average price for an EV is about $55k. I’m not sure how this isn’t“people’s car” pricing.
My bet is that they’re in the oil business. Rarely do you see an employee at any level driving a car in the dino juice industry
I was expecting a Bentley name drop at the very least.
Because using an existing type 1 chassis eliminates the need to meet modern safety standards. This will probably be much, much lighter (and far more of a deathtrap) than a whole new car.
This is a really weird comment.
The old antenna-in-the-windshield on our ‘80 Cutlass was AWFUL.
I live about 15 miles from the Tesla plant. Its in operation 24/7, 365 days a year and so far has produced over 750,000 cars. There are actual people working there too. So pray- tell me why its not a “real” company? Its more of a “real” company than Porsche, which makes cars for douchebags and now shows us a 200k car…
I think both of you are correct, with maybe Torch having a (cynical yet probably realistic) slight edge. I mentioned this on the original Taycan post.. but if I’m making $250k a year.. then that extra $70k for (on paper) less performance and way less range matters to me. If I’m making $2.5M a year.. then I’m buying…