Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    ack
    Ack
    ack

    I'm actually the same way. Often I'll ask people who've seen something before me to just tell me what happens so it doesn't have to be some big secret. It doesn't ruin it for me to know ahead of time how it turns out, I can still enjoy the show/movie, because I recognize that hearing it told sloppily by a friend

    They wrote the article well after the show aired nationally in the U.S. Why should the world wait to discuss it because some people hadn't gotten around to something that was already out?

    Hear hear. There's also the fact that Jezebel wrote this article after it was nationally broadcast. If you couldn't bother getting around to seeing it, you shouldn't expect the world to keep quiet once the secret is out, just to protect you.

    I'm hoping Matthew has faked his death (using an uncanny freshly-dead doppelganger) so that he and Tom Branson can run off together and have the affair they were always meant to have. Hopefully they'll take Mr. Barrow too, dude needs to get out of that house.

    I read somewhere that he was resisting arrest, but I can't seem to find that article anymore...

    Haha, yes.

    NJ is kind of ironically California-shaped. I won't be able to get that out of my head now.

    I was just about to ask that; as soon as I saw "wicked bad diarrhea" I knew.

    Ah, Julie, you and I are similar. My life has pretty much been just a series of embarrassing events. Let's see: there was the time my father pointed out with a laugh that I was 'developing early' to the entire family at the ripe old age of 10, as if I wasn't self-conscious enough. Or the time I went to a pool party

    My womb may also contain various peanut M&Ms, which may or may not have been lost there during my last break-up when I used to fall asleep while eating candy in bed.

    Exactly. It makes sense too... though it is important to be sure you aren't jumping to conclusions, either.

    Well done... on both of these. Perfect examples. You could probably add Lennon & McCartney there too, even though many people still (wrongly) accuse Yoko Ono for their breakup.

    In fairness, I would say two people probably couldn't work together for as long as these two have without tension. After awhile at least one is bound to get tired of the other in some way.

    Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, definitely.

    If I could fuck chocolate my life would be fulfilled. Two greatest pleasures rolled into one.

    Interesting: Jerry Springer once brought up this very situation on his Air America radio show (I know, I know), when discussing parental consent for abortions for under-aged girls. Of course that was way before this happened, but he basically lined up this very situation as a question to the anti-abortion crowd

    Except what you propose isn't realistic. If you could teach people to "respect the proactive aspect" and "use better judgement", why would birth control be necessary in the first place? And if you truly believe that birth control isn't expensive for the individual, that really only shows how little you know about it,

    Instead of shifting the focus on adoption, how about shifting the focus onto access for all to affordable birth control? While I grossly disagree with most of what you say because I believe you are oversimplifying (in a fairly condescending manner, I might add) a wildly complicated issue that varies from woman to

    I concur. The wheelbarrow is pointless. Replace with the robot and everybody wins.