Fuck ridiculous, brandishing is ILLEGAL. He committed a crime by pulling out the gun.

The city was found to be illegally generating revenue and as a result, had to pay back the money they collected BECAUSE THEY NEVER SHOULD HAVE COLLECTED IT IN THE FIRST PLACE. The camera company was able to keep 40% of this revenue despite it having been collected illegally. This is the definition of profiteering.

Yes, and if the private companies only ever structure those contracts in such a way that they profit but never have to pay back any of the money when the cameras are being used illegally, it’s profiteering. The local governments are to blame for the illegal activity but the private companies who install these things…

It’s almost as if all those other groups had moral objections to his work and the ideas he espouses and thus did not want to hear what else he had to say. Infringing on his right to free speech when liberals do it, somehow acceptable when conservatives do it.

You’re right on all points, but none of this really addresses the fact that the private companies who contract for these services don’t actually add enough value for the liability they shift to the local government. Sure, they can install and maintain the equipment cheaper than the government can, and the government…

Yes, because a contract with a company that takes almost half of the revenue in exchange for doing little to no work and exposes your local government to all the liability in the equation is not only the BEST way to save your local government money, it’s the ONLY way to enforce the law!

In this case they were using their cameras illegally but I hope you’re not saying they’re inherently illegal to use, because no court has ruled that way.

1. SCROTUS

This is a timely article, I saw a newish vehicle doing this the other day and thought it was a short. Now, any idea whether something similar applies to BRAKE lamps?

Love DPRMA

WHAT THE FUCK, that’s what that is?!?! I thought these assholes just loved sitting in reverse!

Agree. Have to back you up as I may have autism (I show some signs, but it’s so hard to diagnose in women) but even if I don’t:

Lol I love that too, genuinely. I think women with that codependent tendency hear things like that that and assume it doesn’t apply to them so they just get in those relationships anyway, though. They still have to get their needs met and maybe don’t see an alternative to codependency, or at least a viable one.

Yes, I do see professionals, and I’m smart enough to understand that seeing a couple of “symptoms” does not mean someone has a disease and my doctors’ or counselors’ qualifications did not rub off on me via proximity. You, clearly, are not.

Uh huh. About your qualifications again?

I would almost rather they be open with whatever backwards bullshit they believe just so I know, but I’ll draw the line at racist and sexist slurs, I think.

Probably doesn’t actually care and just wants you to give it a rest with your three wolf moon horseshit. You still haven’t proffered your qualifications for all these diagnoses you’re throwing around.

You are absolutely disgusting and your spammy bullshit has crossed the line into abuse.

Stop spamming this bullshit at everyone. Sadism in the context of BDSM has little to do with anything found in the modern DSM, which you are still not qualified to use to diagnose people and still do not understand. I urge you to seek some counseling of your own. You’ve obviously had a bad experience with someone…

It’s worth noting that sometimes people are not reasonable and no matter how considerately or nicely you let them know about their dogs, they’ve always got some way they would have preferred you let them know about the problem and can’t take action because of it.