Lobot. His name is Lobot.

I guess I've found the limit of my own fanboyism (fanboyality? fanboyishousness?): I see nothing particularly objectionable about Star Wars Kinect. *Especially* the dance numbers. I think it looks fun. If I owned an XBox (I'm a Wii/iOS/PC game person, myself), I'd strongly consider buying it.

Lightweight. I was hatin' on MMOs before it was cool. 'Cept with me it was Eve Online. Followed by later experimentation with nothing else.

Interesting. For me it tends to be "Maynerd G. Krebs!"

"Final Fantasy 9: This Will Be the Last One That Makes Sense or Is, Strictly Speaking, 'Fun' For a Good Long Time"

Not 'Fwag'?

As long as it's not any of that horrible *tub* thumping. That stuff is nightmarish . . .

I know, I'm as confused as you are. "Oh noes! It's something other than a brunette man killing things in a gritty setting! It's HORRIBLE!"

No, I'm sorry: I'm just not seeing the supposed horrible horrific horror of these. This game looks like a lot of fun. I want to buy it and play it. I WILL buy it. I guess I just have more-robust mental faculties and greater openness to new experiences than some people here.

Sweet! This one? I had that too!

1.) I like Star Wars Kinect dance party. I think it's fun. Yeah, sorry no: Don't care about 'epic'. Will settle for 'fun.'

*Which would be a valid complaint if people who call something "Gay" were bigots or homophobes, and yet they're not. I know numerous people who say the equivalent of "That's gay" and yet bear no ill will towards the homosexual community. Hell, I've met homosexuals who call things "Gay" in the same manner. People need…

*...and everything to do with the fact that Diablo has always been a "gritty", "gothic", "dark", game. In Diablo 3 they changed that.*

British people: Do the people at this store hang around just behind your left shoulder—like a journalist's North Korean government-assigned minder—while you're looking at the racks with a big smile and a "WELCOME TO [storename]! Can I help you with anything?"

Said individuals can play what they like. They should keep in mind my Point 3 above, though.

Sorry to keep serial-posting, but: I don't really see the value in *anyone* voice-chatting on PC or console. Ever. At any age.

Nah, ABC would bring on a spokesman from the National Association of Paisley Sky Believers who would debate 'the other side of the issue'. An actual physicist would get to talk for 6.2 seconds about Rayleigh scattering, then the anchor/moderator would cut across them both saying, "Well, we'll have to leave it there…

Would the media even exist without adults' fears of Trends and uninformed 'experts' to scare people about them?

Forsooth:

*Internet safety expert Parry Aftab*