....the cat food comment....

this is the best comment I've read on anything all day.

I was going to comment the same thing, but I think this is just an instance where the title isn't meant to be serious, it's just to set up people for some jokes in the comments.

Maybe I'm missing something here, but breathing properly during exercise is pretty important.

Are we watching the same video? Or do 25 year olds near you look really old?

I read some centaur erotica a while back in which both male and female centaurs had both horse and human sex organs. It was interesting.

But that assumes that everyone who harasses her, does so with a political motivation. I think we need to keep in mind that there are people who troll for the love of the attention and for the love of the trolling. Furthermore, there are few things in this world that piss people off, or get people more riled up, than…

"Internet trolling is not random—it is a sentient, directed, strong-armed goon of the status quo."

Finally, a legit excuse for him to not show up in October.

Those people are NOT trolling. That is a stupid, stupid, stupid thing that has started in the last few years, this labeling of all those you dislike (even for good reason!) as "trolls".

You are probably writing for the wrong website then because that covers most of the paid articles.

Let me show you the smallest violin.

I know you guys keep trying to push this "fuck anything that moves" agenda for whatever reason. And if that's what you want, then by all means, keep doing what you do. But for some of us, monogamy is not some sort of restraining idea. I'm monogamous because I love the person I'm with and I honestly don't want to be…

Romantic or not, I'll take any argument for monogamy. Being called boring or frigid because you want one person is really insulting. I hate when evo-psych people cram the "we all can't help but want to do anything that moves/has variety" down people's throats as well. Some people are monogamous, some aren't, and I…

Re-explaining something is not a bad question. You were implying in your initial comment that everyone that asked "can you explain that again" are "way, way stupider" (to use the ironically incorrect grammar of the person you're replying to) that people of other generations. You were not talking about one particular…

This. Yes, it's terrible that there's a lot of people going into college who haven't learned what they should have already, but in a lot of cases I don't think that is their faults, and they certainly shouldn't just suck it up and keep silent. Unless what they're saying is a matter of students not paying proper…

isn't it terrible when you're a teacher and your students don't already know everything and you have to teach them things?

You can argue with the concept of infallibility all you want, it doesn't discount the fact that the original statement made about the Pope and infallibility was wrong. You're conflating two separate things here.

Right! Exactly. It's funny, as a nonbeliever I spend more time defending/clarifying aspects of Catholicism to other nonbelievers than actually being critical — among Catholics I'm more immediately critical because I know we're on the same page as far as what doctrines, practices, etc. mean.

I'm not asking you to lower your standards. I wouldn't want to put the fat men of the world through that.