TommyRocker
TommyRocker
TommyRocker

Nope. This opens us up to way more problems than it fixes. People aren’t dying left and right because of unsafe cars. They’re dying because of unsafe drivers. This is a revenue racket.

It’s a stretch to call the xj a 90s car, though. It’s an 80s car with an older engine updated with fuel injection. Even the Renix era 4.0 made good power, was reliable, and simple to work on. It wasn’t as clean as the HO under the hood but it was still easy.

White Malibu

Generic car is right. Why would you want this image to be the new Volvo?

Did not know that.

I agree, mostly... It’s still extremely expensive. I know that it will outperform most other muscle cars in just about every metric, and it will absolutely STOMP the classics in every single metric, but the prices have gotten insane. 80 grand for a Challenger! That’s the pony car! In 1970, the king of the hill

My first thought was also TT

How much money? How much power?

The tone of the entire article said he felt that way.

“I don’t own or even like cars, but this car has seats and a steering wheel just like the 1973 Beetle my mom had when I was a kid. It’s fancier and faster, though, and I think that’s stupid.”

“I don’t like or own cars and this car does more than my mom’s ‘73 Beetle did when I was a kid so I think it’s stupid “

The GTO was a Chevelle. Unless you mean the last one. Which was a rebadged Holden, so still not Pontiac originally

That’s the problem. They can’t kill Chevy trucks and consolidate as GMC because the Chevy brand is so old and strong, but they can’t kill GMC and consolidate under Chevy because of the perception of GMC being superior and those people not wanting a Chevy.

Quit belittling the plight of the Manuels.

Racist to acknowledge that. Racist

Racist

Financing. Easy to get financed for a new car and almost no one takes their Jeep off pavement.

In the end, aren’t these super heavy and underperforming anyways? Or no?

I actually like it. Lol