TheSometimesWhy
TheSometimesWhy
TheSometimesWhy

Looking into that woman's eyes, the only thing that comes to mind is:

Not to put too fine a point on it…

Regarding Mr. Cosby, attention would bob to the surface glancingly over the years, only to be diverted by his PR machine and bought of by his lawyers. Mr. Roethlisberger's case was a variation on a theme: he would come into the spotlight for the allegations against him, and they, too, would fade.

Hm, he was asking her is she enjoyed performing oral sex on men?

Heartfelt condolences to you and your Mom…

A blind dead man would see as much, TC.

Well, that certainly paints a picture, now, doesn't it?

"I became a cheerleader."

I suspect that watching the video is irrelevant; the words carry the day.

I think Mr. Rock is an honorable sort. That said, this is clearly a case of his tongue outrunning his brain. We live in a time when the fastest quote is what sells, regardless of its truth or accuracy.

Not wanting to nitpick, and certainly not wanting to defend Mr. Cosby, unless Mr. Rock knows something about the space-time continuum that I don't, how is it that Mr. Roethlisberger is the Original Cosby, when Mr. Cosby's history so clearly predates Mr. Roethlisberger's?

What if he was arrested 31 times for the same offense, selling non-taxed individual cigarettes—might that not explain his state of mind, or at the very least lend it some context? The man had just broken up a fight prior to this tragedy's occurrence. He was acting as a de facto peacekeeper; how does that affect your

Let's say Mr. Garner was as guilty as he could be of the crime he was accused of: selling individual non-taxed cigarettes. In the hierarchy of things, where does that crime fit? Let's forget the utility and value of such a law.

If anyone doesn't understand the significance of NBA stars wearing these T-shirts as a sign of solidarity then that person clearly doesn't understand how movements are built, sustained, and ultimately prevail.

There is no vessel so large that it can't be overfilled with tears.

So we're to assume that Mr. Baker is incapable of change, of coming to heretofore unseen insights as the result of events that are unfolding before his very eyes?

Manny, the implication of your comment is this: Maybe.

I absolutely abhor the grandstanding that has become de riguer after every play in the NFL.

My friend, where to begin with you?

People, people, please! Why all the fuss?