TheGodDamnPope
TheGodDamnPope
TheGodDamnPope

Surprised to see no British cars here.

Not sure where you live, but that only occurs in some intersections here: those intersections where the pedestrian must push the button to trigger the “wall” signal.

Glad someone else caught that. Motorcyclist could have easily been killed in a head on collision and they just keep illegally passing like nothing happened.

Problem is paid subscriptions only amplify your dating success; you have to have some level of success to build upon to begin with.

Idk if this is covered in the Bloomberg article cause it’s paywalled but most dating app subscriptions are a lot cheaper if you subscribe for several months or a year at a time. Maybe the $500/mo is the month-to-month price.

Ah yes, the greedy corporations are the problem. I’m sure it has nothing to do with this:

Such a California thing to do tbh. New laws and regulations being pitched are judged based entirely on their intent and never their (quite foreseeable) real-world consequences.

Nobody here used the word “wave” except you. What a weird straw man and even weirder thing to get so defensive about.

Almost like the whole “rampant crime” thing is a meme spread by people who want voters afraid and angry.

You asked what was so hard about it, and I answered. Risk is often subjective and that’s why the keyword here is “guidelines” not “policy.”

So. Stop. Him.

It blows my mind. No wonder street sideshows and mass theft is running rampant these days. “Well if it’s not hurting anyone, the cops should just let them”.

That’s not really an argument. All of those things are reasons why insurance companies want to raise rates. What are you actually arguing, that CA residents shouldn’t be financially responsible for choosing to live in a high-risk state?

I mean... do other states have this problem? Most states generally don’t regulate as tightly as California. I’d bet there are plenty of other states where the only limitation on auto insurance rates is that of natural competition.

I don’t know how people keep reaching this conclusion. Most of the problems they’re facing, including the ones in this article, are not caused by human drivers.

If they’re substantially cheaper than normal rideshare then they’re probably already putting a dent in drunk driving incidents.

The right way to do this is to implement standards for Vehicle-to-Vehicle communication. Only allow Autonomous cars on certain routes/roadways that are physically separated from other vehicles that are driven by humans. This a commuter lane on freeways, but for autonomous vehicles.

No one would buy a 100% self driving car.

My understanding is that most cow leather is a food production byproduct

Mostly you are paying to skip the line. Shorter and faster lines were supposed to be a benefit of PreCheck, but everyone and their grandmother has it these days and the lines can get pretty long.