TheGodDamnPope
TheGodDamnPope
TheGodDamnPope

Don’t be afraid to cancel and look elsewhere for entertainment. Its absolutely fine out here.

As I understand it 4K streaming is largely redundant for most people with a modern smart TV anyway, since those TVs do their own upscaling.

BUT they also tie Dolby Atmos to that plan, and they actually do seem to have a lot of Atmos content.

Great comment. As someone who’s also been in the industry for a while it’s disappointing to see many media outlets placing all of the blame on the company when this could have been a great educational opportunity to help people avoid being victimized by similar attacks.

Also agree with your points on 2FA, when you and

Internal meaning it was behind authentication, not internal to employees. It’s an opt-in feature that allows you to find relatives based on DNA similarities or whatever. 

We’re not really talking about length or complexity here, we’re talking about password reuse. This is an important distinction because so many people reuse the same password for everything from online to shopping to social media to banking.

Not sure if the bill to help fix this problem went anywhere but if this article from just a few months ago is correct, they are indeed unable not just unwilling because legally they have to prove the car was locked which is basically impossible.

You can’t reason with someone who unironically thinks insurance companies shouldn’t be for-profit just because we’re “forced” to use them. I made a joke about nationalizing tire companies and auto shops (because you can’t legally drive with certain parts of your car in disrepair) to illustrate how dented this argument

Insurance nobody can afford is the same as not offering insurance at all.

That is my biggest issue. Legally I am FORCED to have auto insurance, even though I drive less than 1k miles a year (combo of post covid world and change careers). Since I and other Americans are forced into the scam, it needs to be nationalized as for profit companies exist for profit...not providing what is

At some point it will get so bad that insurance will HAVE to be nationalized, spreading the risk across the whole population of the country.

While it’s nice to hear from someone with firsthand experience the person you replied to is promoting full EVs as a replacement for hybrids. If you think Ford’s battery technology isn’t mature (not to mention all the suspension issues you brought up that have nothing to do with drivetrain) then going full EV seems

To be fair t’s still around 200k if we go by revenue, cars sold, and cost of goods sold. You are welcome to look at their earnings statement, I’d be happy to be proven wrong.

Not sure about that analogy, Pontiac being a GM brand I imagine they honored warranties and such. I don’t think parts availability was a major issue either, especially since most Pontiacs were badge-engineered.

Almost certainly not an apples-to-apples comparison. The $338k figure is a “Bloomberg Intelligence estimate” and it’s not clear how they arrived at that number.

They’re not blatantly violating jack shit. Stop with the gamerchair lawyering.

Ultimately this is about preventing people looking for a bargain on a lightly used vehicle and making them instead shop new

My brother in Christ nobody is buying these to function as an “actual pickup truck.” To the overwhelming majority of buyers it will be a “lifestyle vehicle” just like all the Raptors, Broncos, Defenders, Gladiators, R1T’s etc. that never haul anything or leave pavement.

but the slant of this article and the comments just come off as purely antagonistic of whatever Elon is doing.

Dealer markup and scalpers suck too.

lol