Since "good" and "bad" are subjective, the only objective way to value Instagram's effect on photos is too see what the majority thinks.

If you look at pure number specs alone, yes it is overpriced, but if you look at all the effort that went into designing the hardware (fantastic trackpad, keyboard, screen, etc), the OS, and the Apple ecosystem then it isn't so bad.

What are you, 15? You respond like a child who hears someone disagreeing with their parents' opinions.

It does, I mentioned that in my comment.

I would like you to tell some of those families that died it was worth it you sick fuck. They are not savages and if you took some time to take your head out of your own ass and travel you would see that. Seriously fuck you for saying that, you are an awful person.

My post has more value than yours, that's for sure.

Where does it say art needs to be bold and noble?

Considering more people comment and like photos that have been 'grammed than the same photos posted regularly, I would say that your opinion is not the majority.

This is the worst argument for the success of our military actions ever, and if you don't understand how you haven't been paying any attention or doing any research whatsoever.

Out of Instapaper, Readability, and Pocket (Read it Later) I have always gone with Read It Later.

He isn't buying them for their users. He already has the users.

Actually we do need Strykers and other ground support equipment. That is the exact stuff I'm saying we should invest in, a military that is actually appropriate to the threats facing us over the next few years.

Square has a nice setup where you order what you want on the Square Pay app before you even get to the store, and when you walk in you just say your name and your account is charged.

It is not that Square is unwilling to take a risk on NFC, it's that they have come up with a solution that doesn't even need it.

That flare photo is such an idyllic battlefield.

Compared to what we spend on social services and the military, the amount we invest in infrastructure, education, health and other such things is disgustingly minimal.

WHO WOULD INVADE US?

They are outmanned by WHICH enemies? China is not an enemy and isn't going to be, they are one of our largest trading partners.

Compared to what we spend on social services and the military? No we aren't. We are spending a disgustingly small amount on education, health, and infrastructure.

I'm not saying get rid of all manned aircraft for CAS, I'm saying that the trends we are seeing suggest we will need far less manned aircraft in the near future. UCAVs will be vastly more capable over the next two decades, and we still have no realistic scenarios in which we will be fighting air battles anytime soon.