A perfectly reasonable assessment about a show we know basically nothing about.
A perfectly reasonable assessment about a show we know basically nothing about.
Isn't it obvious? You spoiled the fact that it ends.
Dark Souls 3 Confirmed.
Alright, consider the following:
I think it says a lot that, instead of actually explaining why you think this isn't a problem, you've settled for limp-dick responses that make you look... well, not only pathetic, but extremely ridiculous.
I don't know about you, but I'd call rules like "Only one LGBT person per team" are an actual problem. It's ridiculous, baseless discrimination because... because. It's 20fucking15, restrictions like that one are not only pointless, but considering how quickly news like that travels, really fucking bad for business.
In my day, it stood for "queer". It's basically something of a catch-all for the sexuality and gender misfits who don't quite fit into the other boxes, but get close to it.
I'm curious: are you insinuating that being outraged at that restriction is a "first world problem"?
You do see how it might be weird to people that an account with zero activity is part of 200k groups, right? Like, that's weird.
So I said this below to somebody else, and I'm somewhat proud of how it came out, so I'll say it here:
FNaF and FNaF 2 were actually pretty different games. They had the same basic framework, but the mechanics changed a lot.
I wholeheartedly agree with that. The gaming community is weird about the wait times for games. They bitch about the yearly installments of games like Assassin's Creed and Call of Duty, but then bitch about multi-year waits for others.
They have about as much of a monopoly on gaming as Monopoly does on board games.
Well that was a pathetic tantrum. I think it's cute that you think I'm supposed to feel insulted that some meathead told me that a video game that everybody loves is "for children".
Which was last year.
Initially I thought they might be someone who wandered over here after seeing the article linked somewhere else in the Gawker galaxy, but looking at his posting history, it seems he posts here regularly? So, I don't even know, man.
I find it funny that some asshole on the internet who went out of his way to tell people that he doesn't approve of a hobby is whining about someone else "wasting their time".
Here's the really important question: who gives a shit what something was marketed to 20+ years ago? People from all walks of life enjoy Mario. It's probably the most ubiquitous character on the planet. The entirety of the Mario franchise has sold 500 million units. What the fuck does it matter who you think should be…
I would argue that being bright and lacking swearing or complexity doesn't mean that it's just for children. I would say that the Mario franchise is for people in general.
game for kids