The general perception is that porn for women is less aggressive, that the women involved seem to have a greater input in what's going on and that some concern is given to the pleasure the women are getting from the experience.

Not in the UK. Almost all feminists are geared against porn to point that all other feminist issues are eclipsed by it in the media (for every article about FGM, I'd guess there are 20 about porn) and much of their theories about inequality are based upon porn being the root cause.

What I meant was that it is implied that men wouldn't be interested in 'porn for women.'

It's a fair question to ask. In some ways this plays to the perception that men and women share extremely different tastes and standards in regards to sexual entertainment and that there is no overlap.

Odd ain't it? Surely if you're going to be offended by the nipples in this photo, you're going to be offended by the photo as a whole?

Apparently Dacre, the editor gets lots of money in subsidies for his farm from the EU. The same EU he wants the UK out of.

That's pretty much nailed it. Anyone who is left-wing is already likely a target for the Mail. The likeliness only increases if you're a woman, a single mother and defend the benefits system.

And the Mail has the cheek to accuse other media sources as being bad for women's and particularly young women's self esteem.

There is quite a fuss of sexualisation of children these days in the UK. Some of it is understandable, but certain criticisms seem rather extreme.

Did anyone ever complain about this music video back in the day?

History is why German and the UK have differing national attitudes to state interference and monitoring of media. The UK has never experienced an overtly authoritarian government ruling over them.

It was a newspaper that did it. The Daily Mail ran front pages linking porn to every evil act under the sun for months on end.

That was my impression. The Daily Mail used its front page magic again.

Isn't this out of date? I was under the impression the Daily Mail had convinced retailers to purge all such books... a week after they had a article taking a cheerful look at them.

VPN's are blocked by the filters.

I wonder which country the filter was sourced from. If it was sourced from certain countries and companies, the 'alternative lifestyle' block could probably be explained.

It was the Daily Mail's pressure that forced the issue. Many have joked that they want to corner the market on young women in little clothing.

Shots with genitalia would be obviously porn, though.

You weren't kidding about the NSFW.

There's probably some out there that have legitimate concerns, but many who carry the banner seem nothing more than hate filled idiots who aren't concern about men's right at all but more concerned about limiting women's rights and freedom.