TPL2008
TPL2008
TPL2008

Was the term "morality" IKEA's? I can understand them being concerned that someone was claiming that they had stayed in a B&B when they hadn't but the general morality check is/would be bizarre.

There might not be any personal gratification in it for some and they may be doing to simply please the boys in their lives, I accept that as possibility. I won't condemn that outright mind you as I don't think sending nude pictures/videos of yourself to your partner by itself particularly insightful as to the dynamic

It is odd that if any personal sexual expression should come to enter the public intentionally or otherwise that it is still met with largely negative reactions in regards to the people involved, given that sex and nudity have been in recent times become more acceptable to varying degrees. People seem to have a real

It, in someways, ironically makes it appear that women are the weaker sex and has a tone of the old Victorian ideals of women not being capable of making good decisions.

It occurs to me that we actually don't know the personalities of the women/girls involved. They could be gaining from value from alsorts kinds of things they do in their lives, from academic success to their employment. The making of videos might be an insignificant aspect of their lives but seeing as we have only

I agree, there does seem to be an acceptance of the posting of these videos without criticism of the one of who posts them when compared to the amount of questioning the motives of the women involved.

Possibly. The large issue that I foresee is the possibility of employers coming across them and dismissing the person because of them. The question there is whether it is really a legitimate reason to dismiss a person over such videos or photos?

On the internet there are grown men who post videos of themselves, it therefore would not be surprising if it extended to younger generations.

There seems to have been much talk of trying to bring faith (i.e. Christianity) back into public life lately in the UK, despite many Britons not being particularly religious. I wonder if this is part of it or associated with it. I'm also sensing a slight moral panic within the government and its associated groups over

That is true. BDSM does seem to be characterised more often than not as women sub.

How long before someone tries to generate a moral panic over this?

I'll give her credit, at least she didn't treat porn as one monolithic block.

There definitely is a gender divide on porn in the public and media perception of the matter. In the most serious media any man who watches porn is practically a rapist their eyes and I can honestly say I have never seen any mention of a woman watching porn (of any kind) in the media.

Scaring people with the worst case and/or the unlikeliest consequence is quite common from alsorts of people professing that they know better than you on a wide variety of subjects. They bank on you never questioning them or researching the subject yourself.

Out of interest did he have anything to say on the matter? Or was he checking out the opposition?

Given that Karzai and the Afghan government endorses laws that restrict the freedoms of women in Afghanistan, with the US (and other western governments) barely making a murmur over it, is it surprising that they're trying their luck in the US?

I have sympathy for bulls. I know it's anthropomorphic to imagine that a bull would think like a human but it's not much of a choice between death or celibacy, with a vet manhandling you every so often.

The sudden shift to extreme talk and proposals in many conservatives is astounding, in both degree and speed.

I am sorry for your loss also.

Yeah, I honestly don't see the reasoning in mentioning the cock fighting.