I think that's a fair thing to say. Perhaps there is the possibility for a person to ask another in regards to participating in a sexual act to reconsider over a lengthy period of time. Ultimately of course if one of the participants desires not to do an act, then that act should not take place.
TPL2008
TPL2008
It's probably good for some men too, to realise that a womans body is more than a sexual plaything.
That reminds me of a time when an actress argued against her nipples being airbrushed out on film poster. The radio host suggested to her that perhaps it was because nipples aren't suitable for children.
It is a danger of porn, that because one woman in a certain set of circumstances is willing to do an act, some men assume that every other woman will be willing to do that act and even not consider it a possibility that she might want to be asked. Indeed the same woman who is willing in one set of circumstances may…
I don't consider the act itself degrading. The motivations behind it could be however, particularly when one (or more) of the participants has shown reluctance to it.
That should be [www.legislation.gov.uk]
Legally in the UK is impossible for a woman to rape anyone.
I agree, I had scientific biology books from a very young age that covered sexual reproduction. It didn't take me very long to figure out how it fitted into society and that while it was something adults enjoyed, it had risks (I was aware of HIV and AIDS, and how was spread for instance) and that not everything sexual…
In regards to the male sex addicts I also think it is rather unfair, I'm sure for some it is merely because they find sex enjoyable as a physical action and they desire the chemicals released during that action.
That's possible. I think in society there is sometimes an amnesia in regards to sexual content that occured decades past.
I always consider someone addicted to something (excluding food and water) when they go out of their way to do it or obtain it at the expense of other things they enjoy(ed), don't consider in the risks involved and get considerably angry when some threatens their access to their addiction.
Her arguments sound similar to those levelled at lads mags in the UK, which have been pressured to be behind covers whilst on sale.
I think the English legal definition of rape is clearer.
I agree with the removal, not because of the nudity or even because it is nudity in close proximity to children, given that nothing conceiveably sexual is going on or implied, but because the man probably didn't want to be included in this advertising and particularly advertising with children in it, given certain…
It's fair point. I have read all the books and I thought most of the sexual content, from the consensual to rape was at times clumsy and unbalanced, particularly in regards to the women involved. I recall it not being as noticeable in the later books, perhaps the author was attempting to demonstrate what a crappy…
Loved it.
Well in fairness most them have suffered or been threatened with some sort of sexual abuse/harassment.
No, I think it's just the general mangled approach that Britain (and the world) has taken to sex. It went from something taboo to something more widely acceptable to talk about, see and do outside of married couples. That in itself could have been great thing in my opinion.
I'm curious as to the majority of feminist thought on their (Femen) methods.