Syridian
Syridian
Syridian

But shouldn’t the roles be reversed then?

the actual interface (with largest font selected, an option not even mentioned in the article for some reason?) looks like this

It doesn't. 

Ill be real, while I appreciate the gun is a referencer, they dont look all that similar to each other to me.

I’m interested to see if anyone has good counterpoints to this. I’m all for inclusiveness, but sports are designed around physical things—especially MMA—and there’s a reason why men and women are separated into different leagues for most of them. I’ve yet to hear an argument against it beyond, “they’re women, so they

I don’t know, I don’t get the whole transgender MMA argument. Fallon Fox is living her best life, that’s great! And the last thing I ever want to do is sound like Joe Rogan. But men are just bigger and stronger than women. A woman who transitions to male would be at a disadvantage fighting other men, and a man

You, and Kotaku, and most media outlets that report on this must just use a very different version of Steam than I do. Because while there’s certainly a ton of garbage on Steam I never actually see 99% of it. You actually have to look for the trash and if you’re regularly searching and digging for this shit that’s on

That’s... not a Tanooki Suit. That’s “Racoon Mario” from the “Super Leaf” power-up. This is the Tanooki Suit:

Maybe point out that Hideo Minaba worked as Art Director on both GranBlue Fantasy and Final Fantasy. Because that might explain it.

Read the original messages and judge for yourself. Were these appropriate responses to customers? Or was she an innocent victim?

There was nothing “condescending” about Deroir’s post. It’s exactly the sort of respectful feedback and suggestions I’d expect and encourage from a fan-base, to be honest. And there’s was absolutely nothing misogynistic about it, so for her to make it out to be an issue with her gender was projection at best, and an

This was a smart play too because baby Dva is such a squishy target that most people think of her as a free kill, so pocket healing her while she’s focused lets everyone take down the rest of the opposing team.

So here we’re saying the damage-dealing character is “in the pocket”? Whenever I use it I intend it as the healer being in the pocket, as in the damage-dealer has the healer in their “back pocket” for emergencies.

I guess people forget that tacking -gate on the end of a scandal is a reference back to watergate?

Why would anyone use the word “peasant” to refer to folks enjoying a side-game in a larger game, if not to fluff their evidently poorly-moored sense of self?

Seriously, bro, if you don’t like it, that’s cool and all, but tip that fedora just a little harder before you try using “peasants,” yeah?

Hm...I dunno, I don’t think there’s a problem with a game that is inherently challenging AND punishing. As long as it’s designed well, people have proven they’re fine with a game that challenges you, punishes mistakes and rewards skillful/tactical play.

The Souls series is the most obvious example I can think of.

That makes sense. $10 for a game that you can’t play, or $80 for a game that’s playable, but broken. So a game with no bugs at all should retail for about $10k, right?

Looks like we’re in the wane period of E3 after around 5 years of waxing.